Partijen en gegevens

Pursuant to Article 24, paragraph 7, subparagraph a, of the Convention, the Republic of Estonia designates the Ministry of Justice, in the absence of an extradition treaty, as the authority responsible for making or receiving requests for extradition or provisional arrest.

Pursuant to Article 27, paragraph 2, subparagraph c, of the Convention, the Republic of Estonia designates the Ministry of Justice as the central authority responsible for sending and answering requests for mutual assistance, the execution of such requests or their transmission to the authorities competent for their execution.

Pursuant to Article 35, paragraph 1, of the Convention, the Republic of Estonia designates the Central Criminal Police as the point of contact.

In accordance with Article 27, paragraph 9, sub-paragraph e, the Republic of Hungary informs that, for reasons of efficiency, requests made under this paragraph are to be addressed to its central authority, due to practical reasons.

In accordance with Article 9, paragraph 4, the Republic of Hungary reserves the right not to apply Article 9, paragraph 2, sub-paragraph b.

ln accordance with Article 24, paragraph 7, sub-paragraph a, of the Convention, the Republic of Hungary communicates that the Ministry of Justice is responsible for making or receiving requests for extradition or provisional arrest in the absence of a treaty. The National Central Bureau of Interpol is only responsible for making or receiving requests for provisional arrest.

In accordance with Article 27, paragraph 2, sub-paragraphs a and c, the Republic of Hungary communicates that, regarding requests delivered before starting the criminal procedure, the designated central authority is:

In accordance with Article 35, the Republic of Hungary communicates that the designated point of contact available on a twenty-four hour, seven-day-a-week basis is the Hungarian National Police International Implementing Co-operation Centre.

Reservations

In accordance with Article 42 and Article 4, pararaph 2, of the Convention, the Republic of Lithuania declares that criminal liability occurs if the acts described in Article 4 of the Convention result in serious harm.

In accordance with Article 42 and Article 29, pararaph 4, of the Convention, the Republic of Lithuania declares that it reserves the right to refuse to execute the request for preservation of the data in cases where there is reason to believe that at the time of disclosure the offence, on which the request for preservation of the data is based, is not considered as a crime by the laws of the Republic of Lithuania.

Declarations

In accordance with Article 40 and Article 2 of the Convention, the Republic of Lithuania declares that criminal liability for the act described in Article 2 of the Convention occurs upon access to the whole or any part of a computer system without right by infringing security measures of a computer or a computer network.

Pursuant to Article 24, paragraph 7, sub-paragraph a, of the Convention, the Republic of Lithuania declares that the Ministry of Justice and the General Prosecutor's Office of the Republic of Lithuania are designated as responsible authorities to perform the functions mentioned in Article 24, paragraph 7, sub-paragraph a.

Pursuant to Article 27, paragraph 2, sub-paragraph a, of the Convention, the Republic of Lithuania declares that the Ministry of Justice and the General Prosecutor's Office of the Republic of Lithuania are designated as central authorities to perform the functions mentioned in Article 27.

Pursuant to Article 35, paragraph 1, of the Convention, the Republic of Lithuania declares that the Police Department under the Ministry of the Interior of the Republic of Lithuania is designated as a competent authority to perform the functions mentioned in Article 35.

Pursuant to Article 40 and Article 27, paragraph 9, sub-paragraph e, of the Convention, the Republic of Lithuania declares that, for reasons of efficiency, requests for mutual assistance made under Article 27, paragraph 9, are to be addressed to the above-designated central authorities.

Declarations

In accordance with Article 24, paragraph 7.a, of the Convention, Romania declares that the central authority responsible for making or receiving requests for extradition or provisional arrest is the Ministry of Justice (address: Str. Apollodor nr. 17, sector 5, Bucuresti).

In accordance with Article 27, paragraph 2.c, of the Convention, Romania declares that the central authorities responsible for sending and answering requests for mutual assistance are:

In accordance with Article 35, paragraph 1, of the Convention, Romania declares that the point of contact designated to ensure the immediate and permanent international co-operation in the field of combating cybercrime is the Service of Combating Cybercrime within the Section for Combating Organised Crime and Drugs Trafficking to the High Court of Cassation and Justice (address: Blvd. Libertatii nr. 12-14, sector 5, Bucuresti).

In accordance with Article 24, paragraph 7, sub-paragraph a, of the Convention, the Republic of Macedonia declares that the Ministry of Justice of the Republic of Macedonia is designated as responsible authority to perform the functions mentioned in Article 24, paragraph 7, sub-paragraph a.

In accordance with Article 27, paragraph 2, sub-paragraph a, of the Convention, the Republic of Macedonia declares that the Ministry of Justice of the Republic of Macedonia is designated as central authority to perform the functions mentioned in Article 27.

The 24/7 Network point of contact designated by the Republic of Macedonia is:

Mr Marko ZVRLEVSKI

Deputy Public Prosecutor

Department for Fight against Crime and Corruption

Office of Public Prosecutor

ul. Krste Misirkov bb

1000 SKOPJE

Mob phone: 0038970.397849

Email: office@zjorm.org.mk

In a Note Verbale, the Republic of Bulgaria undertakes to designate its central authorities under the respective articles of the Convention on Cybercrime as soon as possible after the deposit of its instrument of ratification.

In accordance with Article 24, paragraph 7.a, of the Convention, the Republic of Bulgaria declares that it designates the Ministry of Justice as the Central Authority responsible for making or receiving requests for extradition, and the Supreme Cassation Prosecutor's Office as the Central Authority responsible for making and receiving requests for provisional arrest.

In accordance with Article 27, paragraph 2.c, of the Convention, the Republic of Bulgaria declares that it designates the following Central Authorities responsible for sending and answering requests for mutual assistance:

In accordance with Article 35, paragraph 1, of the Convention, the Republic of Bulgaria declares that it designates the National Service for Combating Organized Crime under the Ministry of Interior to perform the functions of point of contact for the purposes of investigations concerning cybercrime.

Ukraine reserves the right not to apply paragraph 1 of Article 6 of the Convention concerning the establishment of criminal liability for the production, procurement for use and otherwise making available for use of the objects designated in subparagraph 1.a.i., and also the production and procurement for use of the objects designated in subparagraph 1.a.ii. of Article 6 of the Convention.

Ukraine reserves the right not to apply to the full extent subparagraphs 1.d and 1.e of Article 9 of the Convention.

In accordance with Article 24, subparagraph 7.a, of the Convention, Ukraine declares that the authorities empowered to perform the functions mentioned in paragraph 7 of Article 24 of the Convention shall be the Ministry of Justice of Ukraine (concerning court's inquiries) and the General Prosecutor's Office of Ukraine (concerning inquiries of bodies of prejudicial inquiry).

In accordance with Article 27, subparagraph 2.c, of the Convention, Ukraine declares that the authorities responsible for sending requests for mutual assistance, answering them, their execution or their transfer to the empowered authorities shall be the Ministry of Justice of Ukraine (concerning courts' commission) and the General Prosecutor's Office of Ukraine (concerning commissions of bodies of prejudicial inquiry).

In February 2014 the Russian Federation launched armed aggression against Ukraine and occupied a part of the territory of Ukraine – the Autonomous Republic of Crimea and the city of Sevastopol, and today exercises effective control over certain districts of the Donetsk and Luhansk oblasts of Ukraine.

These actions are in gross violation of the Charter of the United Nations and constitute a threat to international peace and security. The Russian Federation, as the Aggressor State and Occupying Power, bears full responsibility for its actions and their consequences under international law.

The United Nations General Assembly Resolution A/RES/68/262 of 27 March 2014 confirmed the sovereignty and territorial integrity of Ukraine within its internationally recognized borders. The United Nations also called upon all States, international organizations and specialized agencies not to recognize any alteration of the status of the Autonomous Republic of Crimea and the city of Sevastopol.

In this regard, Ukraine states that from 20 February 2014 and for the period of temporary occupation by the Russian Federation of a part of the territory of Ukraine – the Autonomous Republic of Crimea and the city of Sevastopol – as a result of the armed aggression of the Russian Federation committed against Ukraine and until the complete restoration of the constitutional law and order and effective control by Ukraine over such occupied territory, as well as over certain districts of the Donetsk and Luhansk oblasts of Ukraine, which are temporarily not under control of Ukraine as a result of the aggression of the Russian Federation, the application and implementation by Ukraine of the obligations under the above Conventions, Protocols, Agreement, as applied to the aforementioned occupied and uncontrolled territory of Ukraine, is limited and is not guaranteed.

Documents or requests made or issued by the occupying authorities of the Russian Federation, its officials at any level in the Autonomous Republic of Crimea and the city of Sevastopol and by the illegal authorities in certain districts of the Donetsk and Luhansk oblasts of Ukraine, which are temporarily not under control of Ukraine, are null and void and have no legal effect regardless of whether they are presented directly or indirectly through the authorities of the Russian Federation.

The provisions of the Conventions, Protocols, Agreement regarding the possibility of direct communication or interaction do not apply to the territorial organs of Ukraine in the Autonomous Republic of Crimea and the city of Sevastopol, as well as in certain districts of the Donetsk and Luhansk oblasts of Ukraine, which are temporarily not under control of Ukraine. The order of the relevant communication is determined by the central authorities of Ukraine in Kyiv.

The Permanent Representation of Ukraine to the Council of Europe presents its compliments to the Secretary General of the Council of Europe and has the honour […] to inform about the impossibility to guarantee the implementation by the Ukrainian Side in full of its obligations under the above mentioned international treaties of Ukraine for the period of the armed aggression of the Russian Federation against Ukraine and introduction of martial law on the territory of Ukraine, until full termination of the infringement of the sovereignty, territorial integrity and inviolability of borders of Ukraine.

The Permanent Representation of Bosnia and Herzegovina declares that it will deposit the declaration by which the competent authorities for the purposes of the Convention on cybercrime will be designated, as soon as possible after the deposit of the instrument of ratification.

In accordance with Article 24, paragraph 7, Article 27, paragraph 2, and Article 35, paragraph 1, of the Convention on Cybercrime, Bosnia and Herzegovina designated as the competent authority for the purposes of the Convention : the State Investigation and Protection Agency of Bosnia and Herzegovina. The point of contact is Mr Jasmin GOGIC, Director of Sarajevo's regional office of the State Investigation and Protection Agency of Bosnia and Herzegovina.

Competent authorities (articles 24, 27)

Up-dating of information:

State Investigation and Protection Agency of Bosnia and Herzegovina

(Ministry of Security)

Point of Contact (Article 35)

Up-dating of information:

Direction for cooperation of police bodies of Bosnia and Herzegovina

International police cooperation Sector, INTERPOL

(Ministry of Security)

In accordance with Article 24, paragraph 7, of the Convention, Albania declares that the name and address of the authorities responsible for making or receiving requests for extradition or provisional arrest in the absence of a treaty are:

Ministry of Justice, Bulevardi Zog. I., Tirana

National Central Office of Interpol, Bulevardi Deshmoret e Kombit, Tirana.

In accordance with Article 27, paragraph 2, of the Convention, Albania declares that the name and address of the central authority responsible for sending and answering requests for mutual assistance, the execution of such requests or their transmission to the authorities competent for their execution is:

Ministry of Justice, Bulevardi Zog. I., Tirana

The 24/7 Network point of contact designated by Albania is the:

Police of State

Ministry of Interior

Bulevardi Deshmoret e Kombit

Tirana

Albania

In accordance with Article 9, paragraph 4, of the Convention, the Government of the Kingdom of Denmark declares that the criminal area according to Article 9 shall not comprehend the possession of obscene pictures of a person attained the age of fifteen, if the person concerned has given his or her consent to the possession, cf. Article 9, paragraph 1, letter e.

In accordance with Article 9, paragraph 4, of the Convention, the Government of the Kingdom of Denmark declares that the criminal area according to Article 9 shall not comprehend visual representations of a person appearing to be a minor engaged in sexually explicit conduct, cf. Article 9, paragraph 2, letter b.

In accordance with Article 14, paragraph 3, letter a, of the Convention, the Government of the Kingdom of Denmark declares that Denmark will only apply article 20 concerning monitoring of traffic data to the extent where in accordance with Article 21 there is an obligation to empower the competent authorities to monitor content data, in relation to inquiries of serious crimes, as defined by national law.

Pursuant to Article 38 of the Convention, Denmark declares that, until further notice, the Convention will not apply to the Feroe Islands and Greenland.

Pursuant to Article 6, paragraph 3, of the Convention, the Government of the Kingdom of Norway reserves the right not to apply Article 6, paragraph 1.a.i, of the Convention.

Pursuant to Article 14, paragraph 3, of the Convention, the Government of the Kingdom of Norway, reserves the right not to apply the measures referred to in Article 20 — Real-time collection of traffic data, in cases of less serious offences.

Clarification of what is meant by ‘less serious offences’

Pursuant to Article 14, paragraph 3, the Parties may reserve the right to apply the measures set out in Article 20 only to offences or categories of offences specified in the reservation. It is indicated in the Norwegian reservation, that Norway does not wish to allow the collection of traffic data in real time in connection with minor offences.

Section 216b of the Norwegian Criminal Procedure Act provides for the collection of traffic data in cases where there is just cause for suspecting a person of having committed an offence, or of having attempted to commit an offence, that is punishable by imprisonment for a term of five years or more, or of having contravened specific penal provisions.

The use of various types of communication control and other privacy-invasive coercive measures is primarily restricted to cases involving serious offences, where serious offences are defined as carrying a penalty of five or more years' imprisonment.

Clarification of the relationship between the reservation and the application of Articles 20 and 21 in Norwegian law

The right to apply the measures referred to in Article 20 only to offences specified in the reservation is conditional on the range of offences to which Article 20 is applied not being more restricted than the range of offences to which the measures referred to in Article 21 apply. The condition set out in Article 14 must be interpreted to mean that the range of offences for which traffic data may be collected in real time must not be more restricted than the range of offences for which interception of content data is permitted.

Article 21 (Interception of content data) is governed in Norwegian law by section 216a of the Criminal Procedure Act, and Article 20 by section 216b of the Criminal Procedure Act. Section 216a has a prescribed penalty limit of ten or more years' imprisonment, while section 216b has a prescribed penalty limit of five years' imprisonment. This means that section 216a applies to a narrower range of offences than section 216b, and the condition of Article 14 is thus fulfilled. Norway is therefore entitled to enter a reservation in accordance with Article 14.

Pursuant to Article 29, paragraph 4, of the Convention, the Government of the Kingdom of Norway reserves the right to refuse the request for preservation under this article in cases where it has reasons to believe that at the time of disclosure the condition of dual criminality cannot be fulfilled.

In accordance with Article 24 of the Convention, the Norwegian authority responsible for making or receiving requests for extradition is The Royal Ministry of Justice and the Police, P.O. Box 8005, N-0030 OSLO.

In accordance with Article 27 of the Convention, the Norwegian authority designated is the National Criminal Investigation Service (KRIPOS). Direct telephone number for 24/7 (The High Tech Crime Division) contact is: + 47 23 20 88 88.

Reservation

The United States of America, pursuant to Articles 4 and 42 of the Convention, reserves the right to require that the conduct result in serious harm, which shall be determined in accordance with applicable United States federal law.

The United States of America, pursuant to Articles 6 and 42 of the Convention, reserves the right not to apply paragraphs (1)(a) (i) and (1) (b) of Article 6 (‘Misuses of devices’) with respect to devices designed or adapted primarily for the purpose of committing the offenses established in Article 4 (‘Data interference’) and Article 5 (‘System interference’).

The United States of America, pursuant to Articles 9 and 42 of the Convention, reserves the right to apply paragraphs (2) (b) and (c) of Article 9 only to the extent consistent with the Constitution of the United States as interpreted by the United States and as provided for under its federal law, which includes, for example, crimes of distribution of material considered to be obscene under applicable United States standards.

The United States of America, pursuant to Articles 10 and 42 of the Convention, reserves the right to impose other effective remedies in lieu of criminal liability under paragraphs 1 and 2 of Article 10 (‘Offenses related to infringement of copyright and related rights’) with respect to infringements of certain rental rights to the extent the criminalisation of such infringements is not required pursuant to the obligations the United States has undertaken under the agreements referenced in paragraphs 1 and 2.

The United States of America, pursuant to Articles 22 and 42 of the Convention, reserves the right not to apply in part paragraphs (1) (b), (c) and (d) of Article 22 (‘Jurisdiction’). The United States does not provide for plenary jurisdiction over offenses that are committed outside its territory by its citizen or on board ships flying its flag or aircraft registered under its laws. However, United States law does provide for jurisdiction over a number of offenses to be established under the Convention that are committed abroad by United States nationals in circumstances implicating particular federal interests, as well as over a number of such offenses committed on board United States-flagged ships or aircraft registered under United States law. Accordingly, the United States will implement paragraphs (1) (b), (c) and (d) to the extent provided for under its federal law.

The United States of America, pursuant to Articles 41 and 42 of the Convention, reserves the right to assume obligations under Chapter II of the Convention in a manner consistent with its fundamental principles of federalism.

Declarations

The United States of America declares, pursuant to Articles 2 and 40, that under United States law, the offenses set forth in Article 2 (‘Illegal access’) includes an additional requirement of intent to obtain computer data.

The United States of America declares, pursuant to Articles 6 and 40, that under United States law, the offense set forth in paragraph (1) (b) of Article 6 (‘Misuse of devices’) includes a requirement that a minimum number of items be possessed. The minimum number shall be the same as that provided for by applicable United States federal law.

The United States of America declares, pursuant to Articles 7 and 40, that under United States law, the offense set forth in Article 7 (‘Computer-related forgery’) includes a requirement of intent to defraud.

The United States of America declares, pursuant to Articles 27 and 40, that requests made to the United States under paragraph 9(e) of Article 27 (‘Procedures pertaining to mutual assistance requests in the absence of applicable international agreements’) are to be addressed to its central authority for mutual assistance.

Pursuant to Article 24, paragraph 7, of the Convention, the United States of America is not designating an authority responsible for extradition or provisional arrest in the absence of a treaty, as the United States will continue to rely on bilateral extradition treaties, and the authority responsible for making or receiving extradition requests on behalf of the United States is set forth in the applicable bilateral extradition treaties.

Pursuant to Article 27, paragraph 2, of the Convention, the Office of International Affairs, United States Department of Justice, Criminal Division, Washington, D.C., 20530, is designated as the central authority of the United States of America for mutual assistance under the Convention.

Pursuant to Article 35, paragraph 1, of the Convention, the Computer Crime and Intellectual Property Section, United States Department of Justice, Criminal Division, Washington, D.C., 20530, is designated as the point of contact available on a twenty-four hour, seven-day-a-week basis to ensure the provision of immediate assistance under the Convention. Contact Information for the Computer Crime and Intellectual Property Section is given below:

24/7 Contact: United States of America

Contact and Telephone Number:

Computer Crime and Intellectual Property Section (CCIPS)

U.S. Department of Justice, Washington, DC

Tel: +1-202-514-1026 / Monday – Friday 0900 – 1800 hrs

Tel: +1-202-353-5216 / Mon – Fri after hours, Saturdays, Sundays, holidays

Tel: +1-202-514-6113 / Always on, but only monitored Monday – Friday 0900 – 1800 hrs

Description of Contact

CCIPS is a section of the Criminal Division of the U.S. Department of Justice that has 40 lawyers with responsibilities for combating cybercrime and theft of intellectual property, and with expertise in obtaining electronic evidence. Many CCIPS lawyers also have expertise in international assistance. CCIPS has ‘duty attorneys’ available 24-hours a day, 7 days a week to respond to urgent requests for assistance.

Language Capabilities of the Contact: English

What To Say When Calling Contact Number:

During business hours, call +1-202-514-1026. Tell the receptionist (1) that you have ‘a cybercrime 24-7 request’; (2) from what country you are calling; and (3) that you want to be connected to ‘a duty attorney’.

After business hours and on Saturdays, Sundays and holidays, call +1-202-353-5216. Your call will be connected directly to a duty attorney.

Fax Information:

+1-202-514-6113. This fax machine operates 24 hours a day, 7 days a week, but faxes sent outside of normal working hours will not receive attention until the next business day.

Time Zone : UTC/GMT -05:00 (Daylight Savings Time : +01:00)

In accordance with Article 24, paragraph 7, of the Convention, the authority designated by the Netherlands is:

The Ministry of Justice

Office of International Legal Assistance in Criminal Matters

PO BOX 20301

2500 EH THE HAGUE

Tel. +31 (0)70-3707911

Fax +31 (0)70-3707945

In accordance with Article 27, paragraph 2.c, of the Convention, the central authority designated by the Netherlands is:

Landelijk Parket van het openbaar ministerie

(National office of the public prosecution service)

Postbus 395

3000 AJ ROTTERDAM

Tel. +31 (0)10-496-69-66

Fax +31 (0)10-484-69-78

In accordance with Article 35 of the Convention, the point of contact designated by the Netherlands is:

Landelijk Parket van het openbaar ministerie

(National office of the public prosecution service)

Postbus 395

3000 AJ ROTTERDAM

Tel. +31 (0)10-496-69-66

Fax +31 (0)10-484-69-78

In accordance with Article 38, paragraph 2, of the Convention on Cybercrime, the Kingdom of the Netherlands declares that it accepts the said Convention for Curaçao.

In accordance with Article 24, paragraph 7, Article 27, paragraph 2, and Article 35 of the Convention on Cybercrime, the Kingdom of the Netherlands declares that the central authority and point of contact 24/7 designated by Curaçao is:

National Central Bureau of INTERPOL Curaçao

Bastion, Fort Amsterdam z/n

Curaçao

Interpol.curacao@ip-willem.org

In accordance with Article 24, paragraph 7, of the Convention, the Government of the Kingdom of Denmark has designated the Ministry of Justice, Slotsholmsgade 10, DK-1216 Copenhagen K, Denmark, as competent authority.

In accordance with Article 27, paragraph 2, of the Convention, the Government of the Kingdom of Denmark has designated the Ministry of Justice, Slotsholmsgade 10, DK-1216 Copenhagen K, Denmark, as competent authority.

In accordance with Article 35, paragraph 1, of the Convention, the Government of the Kingdom of Denmark has designated the Danish National Police, Police Department, Polititorvet 14, DK-1780 Copenhagen V, Denmark, as competent authority.

In accordance with Article 24, paragraph 7, of the Convention, the Republic of Slovenia declares that:

In accordance with Article 27, paragraph 2, of the Convention, the Republic of Slovenia designates the Ministry of Justice as the central authority responsible for sending and answering requests for mutual assistance:

Ministry of Justice

Zupanciceva 3

SI - 1000 Ljubljana

In accordance with Article 35 of the Convention, the Republic of Slovenia designates as point of contact available on a twenty-four hours, seven-day-week-basis, the Ministry of the Interior, Criminal Investigation Police Directorate, International Police Cooperation Section:

Ministry of the Interior

Criminal Investigation Police Directorate

International Police Cooperation Section

Tel. +386 1 428 4780

Fax +386 1 251 75 16

Mobile phone (officer on duty): +386 41 713 680 ; +386 41 713 699

Email: interpol.ljubljana@policija.si

Pursuant to Article 9, paragraph 4, of the Convention, Iceland reserves the right not to apply Article 9, paragraph 2, letters b and c, of the Convention.

In accordance with Article 24, paragraph 7, of the Convention, the Government of Iceland has designated the Ministry of Justice, Skuggasundi, 150 Reykjavík, Iceland, as the authority responsible for the making or receipt of a request for extradition or provisional arrest in the absence of a treaty.

In accordance with Article 27, paragraph 2.c, of the Convention, the Government of Iceland has designated the Ministry of Justice, Skuggasundi, 150 Reykjavík, Iceland, as the authority responsible for sending and answering requests for mutual assistance, the execution of such requests, or the transmission of them to the authorities competent for their execution.

In accordance with Article 35 of the Convention, the the Government of Iceland has designated the National Commissioner of the Icelandic Police (Ríkislögreglustjórinn), Skúlagata 21, 101 Reykjavík, Iceland, as the point of contact available on a 24 hours, 7 days per week basis in order to ensure the provision of immediate assistance for the purpose of investigations or proceedings concerning criminal offences related to computer systems and data, or for the collection of evidence in electronic form of a criminal offence.

Iceland declares that it withdraws its reservation made on 29 January 2007 with respect to Article 9, paragraph 2, letters b and c, of the Convention.

Change of competent authority:

(Articles 24 and 27)

Ministry of the Interior

Sölvhólsgötu 7

150 Reykjavík

Pursuant to Article 2 of the Convention, the Republic of Finland declares that it requires for the punishability of illegal access as referred to in the Article that the offence be committed by infringing security measures.

Pursuant to Article 11, paragraph 3, of the Convention, the Republic of Finland declares that it will not apply paragraph 2 of the same article, concerning the criminalisation of attempt, to petty criminal damage nor petty forgery.

Pursuant to Article 14, paragraph 3.a, of the Convention, the Republic of Finland declares that it only applies Article 20 to offences aimed at a computer system committed by using telecommunications terminal equipment, pandering, threatening of persons to be heard in the administration of justice, menace, narcotic offences or attempts of the above, preparation of offences to be committed with terrorist intent and offences punishable by imprisonment of at least four years.

Pursuant to Article 14, paragraph 3.b, of the Convention, the Republic of Finland declares that it does not apply the measures referred to in Articles 20 and 21 to communications being transmitted within a computer system if the system is being operated for the benefit of a closed group of users and does not employ public communications networks and is not connected with another computer system, whether public or private.

Pursuant to Article 35, paragraph 1, of the Convention, the Republic of Finland designates the National Bureau of Investigation, Criminal Intelligence Division / Communications Centre as the point of contact available on a twenty-four hour, seven-day-a-week basis.

Pursuant to Article 24, paragraph 7, of the Convention, the Republic of Finland declares that the authority responsible for making and receiving requests in Finland is:

Pursuant to Article 27, paragraph 2.a, of the Convention, the Republic of Finland declares that the central authority who is responsible for sending and answering requests for mutual assistance, the execution of such requests or their transmission to the authorities competent for their execution is the Ministry of Justice, Eteläesplanadi 10, FIN-00130 Helsinki.

In accordance with Article 22, paragraph 2, of the Convention, the Republic of Latvia reserves the right not to establish its jurisdiction over any offence established in accordance with Articles 2 through 11 of the Convention when the offence is committed by one of its nationals, if the offence is punishable under criminal law where it was committed.

In accordance with Article 29, paragraph 4, of the Convention, the Republic of Latvia reserves the right to refuse the request for preservation under this article in cases where it has reasons to believe that at the time of disclosure the condition of dual criminality cannot be fulfilled.

In accordance with Article 24, paragraph 7.a, of the Convention, the Republic of Latvia declares that the authority responsible for making or receiving requests for extradition or provisional arrest in the absence of a treaty is:

Prosecutor General Office

Kalpaka Blvd. 6, Riga

LV-1801, Latvia

Phone: +371 7044400 - Fax: +371 7044449

E-mail: webmaster@lrp.gov.lv

In accordance with Article 27, paragraph 2.c, of the Convention, the Republic of Latvia declares that the authority responsible for sending and answering requests for mutual assistance, the execution of such requests or their transmission to the authorities competent for their execution is:

Ministry of Justice

Brivibas Blvd. 36, Riga

LV-1536, Latvia

Phone: +371 7036801 - Fax: +371 7285575

E-mail: tm.kanceleja@tm.gov.lv

In accordance with Article 35, paragraph 1, of the Convention, the Republic of Latvia declares that the point of contact is:

International Cooperation Department of Central Criminal Police Department of State Police

Brivibas Str. 61, Riga

LV-1010, Latvia

Phone: +371 7075031 - Fax: +371 7075053

E-mail: kanc@vp.gov.lv

Up-dating of contact information:

International Cooperation Department of the Central Criminal Police Department of the State Police

Ciekurkalna 1st line 1, k-4

Riga, LV-1026

Latvia

Phone: +371 67075212

Fax: +371 67075053

E-mail: ssp@vp.gov.lv

Website : www.vp.gov.lv

In accordance with Article 43 of the Convention, the Republic of Latvia withdraws its reservation to Article 22 contained in the instrument of ratification deposited on 14 February 2007 and completed by a letter from the Ministry of Foreign Affairs dated 31 May 2007.

Estonia designates as point of contact for the network 24/24-7/7:

Mr Dmitri RUDAKOV

Estonian Central Criminal Police

Tel.: +372 612 3684

Email: dmitri.rudakov@kkp.pol.ee

In accordance with Article 42 and Article 29, paragraph 4, of the Convention, the Slovak Republic avails itself of the right to refuse the request for preservation in cases where it has reasons to believe that at the time of disclosure the condition of dual criminality cannot be fulfilled.

In accordance with Article 42 and Article 4, paragraph 2, of the Convention, the Slovak Republic avails itself of the right to require for the criminal liability of the conduct referred to in Article 4, paragraph 1, that it results in serious harm.

In accordance with Article 24, paragraph 7.a, of the Convention, the Slovak Republic declares that the Ministry of Justice of the Slovak Republic (Zupné námestie 13, 81311 Bratislava) is designated as the authority responsible for making and receiving requests for extradition. The competent authority for receiving requests for provisional arrest is the competent prosecutor of the Regional Prosecutor's Office and the Ministry of Justice of the Slovak Republic. The competent authority for making requests for provisional arrest is the Ministry of Justice of the Slovak Republic and the court competent for issuing an international arrest warrant.

In accordance with Article 27, paragraph 2.a, of the Convention, the Slovak Republic declares that the central authorities are the Ministry of Justice of the Slovak Republic (Zupné námestie 13, 81311 Bratislava) and the General Prosecutor's Office (Stúrova 2, 81285 Bratislava).

In accordance with Article 35 of the Convention, the Slovak Republic notifies that the point of contact is the Presidium of the Police Forces, International Police Cooperation Office, National Central Bureau of Interpol (Vajnorská 25, 81272 Bratislava).

In accordance with Article 40 of the Convention, the Slovak Republic declares that it avails itself of the possibility to require additional element within the meaning of Article 2 of the Convention, and for a criminal liability of illegal access it requires that the offence be committed by infringing security measures, with the intent of obtaining computer data or other dishonest intent, or in relation to a computer system that is connected to another computer system.

Central authority: Updating of contact information:

(Articles 24 and 27) Ministry of Justice of the Slovak Republic

[…]

In accordance with Article 43, paragraph 1, of the Convention, the Slovak Republic withdraws its reservation to Article 4, paragraph 2, of the Convention made upon ratification of the Convention, on 8 January 2008.

In accordance with Article 35 of the Convention, the Slovak Republic declares that the designated point of contact for the purposes of this article is:

Presidium of the Police Force

Criminal Police Office

Cybercrime Department

[…]

In accordance with Article 40 of the Convention, the Slovak Republic declares that it avails itself of the possibility to require additional element within the meaning of Article 2 of the Convention, and for a criminal liability of illegal access it requires that the offence be committed by infringing security measures.

In accordance with Article 24, paragraph 7, and Article 27, paragraph 2, of the Convention, the Italian Republic declares that the Minister of Justice of the Italian Republic is designated as the competent authority:

Ministry of Justice

Department for Affairs of Justice

Directorate General of Criminal Justice

Office II (International Judicial Cooperation)

Viale Arenula 70

I - 00186 ROMA

Tel: 0039.06.68.85.21.80

Fax: 0039.06.68.85.73.59

Email: ufficio2.dgpenale.dag@giustizia.it

In accordance with Article 35 of the Convention, the Italian Republic notifies that the point of contact is to be determined by the Minister of the Interior, in concertation with the Minister of Justice.

In accordance with Article 35 of the Convention, Italy designates as point of contact for the purposes of the Convention:

Mr Giuseppe Corasaniti

District Attorney

Rome

Tel.: +39.0638703134

Fax: +39.0638703137

Email: giuseppe.corasaniti@giustizia.it

Internet : wwwmedialaw.it

http://justechnologies.blogspot.com/

In accordance with Article 24, paragraph 7, Article 27, paragraph 2, and Article 35, paragraph 1, of the Convention on Cybercrime, the Republic of Armenia designated as the national point of contact for cooperation in combating cybercrime, available on a twenty-four hour, seven-day-a-week basis:

Mr. Samvel Hovsepyan

Police Major

Deputy Head of 3rd division of the 1st department of the Main Department on Combat Against

Organized

Crime of the Police of the Republic of Armenia

Tel +(37410) 562718

Fax: +(37410) 578467

Email: cybercrime@police.am

In accordance with Article 24, paragraph 7, Article 27, paragraph 2, and Article 35, paragraph 1, of the Convention on Cybercrime, Croatia designates as the competent authorities for the purposes of the Convention:

Articles 24 and 27: the Ministry of Justice, Dezmanova 6, 10 000 Zagreb.

Article 35: the Ministry of interior, Police — Directorate for crime police, Ilica 335, 10 000 Zagreb.

In accordance with Article 27, paragraph 2.a, of the Convention, the Federal Republic of Germany declares that the central authority responsible for mutual aasistance requests in the absence of applicable international agreements is the Ministry of Foreign Affairs (address: Werderscher Markt 1, 10117 Berlin).

The Republic of Serbia will designate its central authorities under Articles 24, 27 and 35 of the Convention on Cybercrime as soon as possible after the deposit of its instrument of ratification.

In accordance with Articles 24, 27 and 35 of the Convention, Serbia designates as the central authorities in charge for the implementation of the Convention:

Ms Lidija KOMLEN NIKOLIC

District Attorney for High-Tech Crime of the Republic of Serbia

Savska 17A

11000 Beograd

Tel.: + 381 11 36 01 278

Mobile: +381 63 38 44 42

Email: lidija.komlen@beograd.vtk.jt.rs

Ministry of Interior of the Republic of Serbia

Directorate of Crime Police

Department for the fight against organized crime

Bulevar Mihajla Pupina 2

11070 Novi Beograd

Tel./Fax: +381 11 31 48 66

The Republic of Azerbaijan deliberately distorts the core and essence of the Nagorno Karabakh issue with respect to the cause and effect of the conflict originated as consequence of Azerbaijan's policies of ethnic cleansing against the people of the Nagorno Karabakh, aimed at the suppression of its free will and followed by large-scale military aggression against the self-determined Nagorno Karabakh Republic.

As a result, several territories of the Nagorno Karabakh Republic have been occupied by the Republic of Azerbaijan and some territories of Azerbaijan came under the control of the Nagorno Karabakh Republic.

Furthermore, Article 38 of the Convention, to which the Declaration of the Republic of Azerbaijan refers, is not applicable in respect of the Republic of Azerbaijan. The clause on territorial application deals only with European States with territories having special status, such as overseas territories, allowing these States to extend the application of the Convention to those territories.

The Government of the Republic of Cyprus designates as the authority responsible for making or receiving requests for extradition or provisional arrest in the absence of a treaty in accordance with Article 24 of the Convention, for requests in accordance with Article 27 of the Convention and as point of contact in accordance with Article 35 of the Convention, and in accordance with the provisions of section 17 of the Cybercrime Convention (Ratification) Law of 2004 (22(III)/2004) as from its entry into force (i.e. on 30 April 2004), the following authority:

Ministry of Justice and Public Order

Athalassas Av. 125

1461 NICOSIA

Tel.: + 357 22 805928

Fax: +357 22 518328

Emails: emorphaki@mjpo.gov.cy

registry@mjpo.gov.cy

Austria will, in accordance with Article 29, paragraph 4, of the Convention, refuse a request for mutual assistance to order the preservation of stored computer data, as provided for under Article 16 of the Convention, if the condition of dual criminality is not fulfilled; this does not apply to the offences established in accordance with Articles 2 through 11 of this Convention.

Austria declares that the following authority has been designated as responsible pursuant to Articles 24, paragraph 7, and 27, paragraph 2, of the Convention on Cybercrime:

Bundesministerium für Justiz (Federal Ministry of Justice)

Abt. IV 4 Internationale Strafsachen (International Criminal Matters)

1070 Wien, Museumstrasse 7

Tel.: +43 1 52 1 52-0

E-Mail: team.s@bmj.gv.at

Austria declares that the following authority has been designated as point of contact pursuant to Article 35 of the Convention:

Bundesministerium für Inneres (Federal Ministry of the Interior),

Bundeskriminalamt (Federal Criminal Police Office)

Büro 5.2 Cyber-Crime-Competence-Center

Josef Holaubek Platz 1

1090 Wien

Tel.: +43 1 51 2 56 22

In accordance with Article 42 and Article 6 (Misuse of devices), paragraph 3 of the Convention, the Government of Japan reserves the right not to apply Article 6, paragraph 1, except for:

In accordance with Article 42 and Article 9 (Offences related to child pornography), paragraph 4 of the Convention, the Government of Japan reserves the right not to apply Article 9, paragraph 1.d and e and paragraph 2.b and c, except for the offences set forth in Article 7 (Provision of child pornography and other related activities) of the Act on Punishment of Activities Relating to Child Prostitution and Child Pornography, and the Protection of Children (Law No. 52, 1999).

In accordance with Article 42 and Article 11 (Attempt and aiding or abetting), paragraph 3 of the Convention, the Government of Japan reserves the right not to apply Article 11, paragraph 2 to the offences established pursuant to Article 4, Article 5, Article 7 and Article 9, paragraph 1.a and c, except for the offences set forth in Article 168-2 (Creation of electromagnetic record of unauthorised commands) or Article 234-2 (Obstruction of business by damaging a computer) of the Penal Code.

In accordance with Article 42 and Article 22 (Jurisdiction), paragraph 2 of the Convention, the Government of Japan reserves the right not to apply the jurisdiction rules laid down in Article 22, paragraph 1.d to the offences established pursuant to Article 6, paragraph 1.a.ii of the Convention as far as the offences set forth in Article 13 (Prohibition of acts of facilitating unauthorised computer access without knowing the purpose of unauthorized computer access of the obtainer) of the Act of Prohibition of Unauthorised Computer Access are concerned.

In accordance with Article 42 and Article 29 (Expedited preservation of stored computer data), paragraph 4 of the Convention, the Government of Japan reserves the right to refuse the request for preservation under Article 29 in cases where it has reasons to believe that at the time of disclosure the condition of dual criminality cannot be fulfilled.

In accordance with Article 40 and Article 2 (Illegal access) of the Convention, the Government of Japan requires that the offences established pursuant to Article 2 be commited by infringing security measures and in relation to a computer system that is connected to another computer system.

In accordance with Article 40 and Article 3 (Illegal interception) of the Convention, the Government of Japan requires that the offences established pursuant to Article 3 be committed in relation to a computer system that is connected to another computer system, and that, in addition, be committed with dishonest intent as far as the offences set forth in Article 109-2 (Decoding the content of cipher communications) of the Radio Law (Law No. 131, 1950) are concerned.

In accordance with Article 40 and Article 27 (Procedures pertaining to mutual assistance requests in the absence of applicable international agreements), paragraph 9.e of the Convention, for reasons of efficiency, requests made to the Government of Japan under the said paragraph are to be addressed to the central authorities of the Government of Japan.

Pursuant to Article 24 (Extradition), paragraph 7.a of the Convention, the Government of Japan notifies that:

The Minister for Foreign Affairs

2-2-1, Kasumigaseki,

Chiyoda-ku

Tokyo 100-8919

is the authority responsible for making or receiving requests for extradition or provisional arrests in the absence of a treaty

Pursuant to Article 27 (Procedures pertaining to mutual assistance requests in the absence of applicable international agreements), paragraph 2.a and c of the Convention, the Government of Japan designates, a) as the authorities responsible for answering requests for mutual assistance:

The Minister of Justice

or the person designated by the Minister (Director of International Affairs Division)

Criminal Affairs Bureau

Ministry of Justice

1-1-1, Kasumigaseki

Chiyoda-ku

Tokyo 100-8977

Reservations:

In accordance with Article 9, paragraph 4, of the Convention, the Government of the United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland reserves the right not to apply Article 9 (2) (b), which states that ‘child pornography’ includes ‘a person appearing to be a minor engaged in sexually explicit conduct’, as this provision is incompatible with domestic law regarding indecent photographs of children.

In accordance with Article 9, paragraph 4, of the Convention, the Government of the United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland declares that it reserves the right not to apply Article 9 (2) (c), as Scotland has no offence covering a ‘realistic’ image which is not, and is not derived from, a photograph of a real person.

In accordance with Article 22, paragraph 2, of the Convention, the Government of the United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland reserves the right not to apply Article 22 (1) (d). The UK can extend extraterritorial jurisdiction over most of the offences in Articles 2-11, although not over fraud committed in Scotland, under specific circumstances. As there is no overarching arrangement that extends extra-territorial jurisdiction, the UK cannot say that it will apply in every case.

In accordance with Article 29, paragraph 4, of the Convention, the Government of the United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland reserves the right not to apply Article 29 where execution of the request for preservation requires the exercise of coercive powers and where dual criminality cannot be established.

Declarations:

In accordance with Article 24, paragraph 7.a, of the Convention, the Government of the United Kingdom declares that the authorities responsible for making or receiving requests for extradition or provisional arrest in the absence of a treaty are:

Home Office

Judicial Co-operation Unit

5th Floor, Fry building

2 Marsham Street

London

SW1P 4DF

Scottish Government (when the person is believed to be in Scotland)

Criminal Procedure Division

St. Andrew's House

Regent Road

Edinburgh

EH1 3DG

In accordance with Article 27, paragraph 2.c, of the Convention, the Government of the United Kingdom declares that the competent authorities to which requests for mutual assistance should be made to the relevant Central Authority are:

For matters related to England, Wales, and Northern Ireland:

UK Central Authority

Home Office

5th Floor Peel building

2 Marsham Street

London SW1P 4DF

For matters related to Scotland:

International Co-operation Unit

Argyle House

C Floor

3 Lady Lawson Street

Edinburgh

EH3 9DR

For matters related to indirect taxation:

Law Enforcement & International Advisory Division

HM Revenue and Customs - Solicitor's Office

Room 2/74

100 Parliament Street

London

SW1A 2BQ

Reservations:

In accordance with Article 6, paragraph 3, of the Convention, Switzerland reserves the right to apply Article 6, paragraph 1, only when the offence concerns the sale, distribution or any other provision of the items referred to in Article 6, paragraph 1 a.ii.

In accordance with Article 9, paragraph 4, of the Convention, Switzerland reserves the right not to apply Article 9 (2) (b).

In accordance with Article 14, paragraph 3, of the Convention, Switzerland reserves the right to apply the measures referred to in Article 20 to crimes and offences under the Criminal Code.

In accordance with Article 29, paragraph 4, of the Convention, Switzerland reserves the right to subject to the condition referred to in Article 29, paragraph 4, the execution of any letters rogatory requiring the application of any coercive measure.

Declarations:

Switzerland declares that it will apply Article 2 to the extent that the offence is committed by infringing safety measures.

Switzerland declares that it will apply Article 3 insofar as the offence is committed with intent to unjust enrichment.

Switzerland declares that it will apply Article 7 only to the extent that the offence is committed with a view to providing a benefit to oneself or a third party or causing damages.

In accordance with Article 9, paragraph 3, of the Convention, Switzerland declares that, within the context of Article 9, paragraph 2, it understands by the term "minor" any person under the age of sixteen.

In accordance with Article 24, paragraph 7 of the Convention, the Federal Office of Justice, the Federal Department of Justice and Police, 3003 Berne, is the competent authority, for Switzerland, for sending and receiving requests for extradition or provisional arrest.

In accordance with Article 27, paragraph 2, of the Convention, the Federal Office of Justice, in the Federal Department of Justice and Police, 3003 Berne, is the authority responsible for sending and receiving legal requests for mutual assistance.

Switzerland declares that in case of emergency, within the context of Article 27, paragraph 9, of the Convention, the Federal Office of Justice and Police, 3003 Berne, is the central authority to which all requests to Switzerland for mutual assistance must be addressed.

In accordance with Article 35 of the Convention, the Federal Office of Justice, in the Federal Department of Justice and Police, 3003 Berne, is the point of contact available on a 24 hours a day, seven days a week basis.

In accordance with Article 24, paragraph 7, of the Convention on Cybercrime, Malta designates as authority responsible for the making or receipt of a request for extradition or provisional arrest in the absence of a treaty:

The Ministry for Justice

Office of the Prime Minister

Auberge de Castille

Valletta VLT 2000

Malta

In accordance with the provisions of Article 27, paragraphs 2 and 9.e, of the Convention on Cybercrime, Malta designates as central authority:

The Office of the Attorney General

The Palace

Valletta

Malta

Email: ag.mla@gov.mt

In accordance with the provisions of Article 35 of the Convention on Cybercrime, Malta declares that the contact point for the 24/7 network is:

The Cybercrime Unit

Malta Police

Police General Headquarters

Floriana

Malta

Phone: +356 22942231 (office hours)

+356 21224001 (outside office hours)

Fax: +356 22942236

Email : computer.crime@gov.mt

In accordance with Article 6, paragraph 3, of the Convention, Georgia declares that criminal liability for acts provided for by Article 6, paragraph 1(a), can be imposed where a device, including a computer program, is designed or can be adapted for the purpose of commiting acts under Articles 2 to 5 of the Convention.

In accordance with Article 24, paragraph 7, sub-paragraph a, of the Convention, Georgia declares that the central authority responsible for making or receiving requests for extradition or provisional arrest in the absence of a treaty is:

Ministry of Justice of Georgia

Address: 24a Gorgasali str., Tbilisi 0114, Georgia

Tel: +995322405143;

Fax: +995322405142

E-mail: international.psg@justice.gov.ge

In accordance with the Article 27, paragraph 2, sub-paragraph c, of the Convention, Georgia declares that the central authority responsible for sending and answering requests for mutual assistance, the execution of such requests or their transmission to the authorities competent for their execution is:

Ministry of Justice of Georgia

Address: 24a Gorgasali str., Tbilisi 0114, Georgia

Tel: +995322405143;

Fax: +995322405142

E-mail: international.psg@justice.gov.ge

In accordance with Article 35, paragraph 1, of the Convention, Georgia designates the following as the national point of contact for cooperation in combating cybercrime, available on a 24/7 basis:

Ministry of Internal Affairs of Georgia Criminal Police Department

Address: 10 G. Gulua str., Tbilisi 0114, Georgia;

Tel: +995577526553, +995577556841

Fax: +995322746204

E-mail: cooperation@pol.ge

In accordance with Article 40 and Article 27, paragraph 9, sub-paragraph e, of the Convention, Georgia declares that, for reasons of efficiency, requests for mutual assistance made under Article 27, paragraph 9, are to be addressed to its central authority.

In accordance with Article 22 of the Convention, the Belgian Government reserves the possibility of applying Article 22.1.c of the Convention only if the following specific condition is fulfilled: Article 36 of the Law of 27 June 1937, relating to the regulation of air navigation, considers as committed in Belgium the offences committed on board a Belgian aircraft in flight.

In accordance with Article 42 of the Convention, Belgium reserves the right to apply Article 22.1.d of the Convention to a Belgian national who is guilty of a criminal offence committed outside the territory of the Kingdom, only in cases where such an offence is considered to be a criminal offence according to Belgian law, and the offence is punished by the law of the country where it was committed, and the perpetrator is found in Belgium. Belgium reserves the right to institute proceedings, in cases where the victim of the offence is a foreigner, only upon a preliminary complaint from the victim, his or her family or an official notice from the authorities of the State where the offence was committed.

In accordance with Article 2 of the Convention, the Belgian Government declares that it will establish as criminal offences the conducts referred to in Article 2, in relation to "internal hacking" as provided for by Article 550bis, §2 of the Penal Code, only when those conducts are committed with intent to defraud or to cause damage.

In accordance with Article 7 of the Convention, the Belgian Government declares that it will establish as criminal offences the conducts provided for by Article 7 only when they are committed with fraudulent intent or intent to cause damage.

In accordance with Article 24.7.a of the Convention, the Belgian Government declares that the authority responsible for making or receiving requests for extradition or provisional arrest, in the absence of a treaty, is:

Service Public Fédéral Justice

Service de la coopération internationale pénale

Boulevard de Waterloo 115

1000 Bruxelles

fax : +32(0)2/210.57.98

(until the end of 2012).

In accordance with Article 27.2 of the Convention, the Belgian Government declares that the authority responsible for sending and answering requests for mutual assistance, and for the execution of such requests or their transmission to the authorities competent for their execution is:

Service Public Fédéral Justice

Service de la coopération internationale pénale

Boulevard de Waterloo 115

1000 Bruxelles

fax : +32(0)2/210.57.98

(until the end of 2012).

In accordance with Article 35 of the Convention, the Belgian Government designates as a point of contact available on a twenty-four hour, seven-day-a-week basis, the following department:

Federal Judicial Police

Direction for Combating Economic and Financial Crime

Federal Computer Crime Unit (FCCU)

Tel: +32-2-743-73-84 24 hours a day, 7 days a week.

+32-2-743-74-74 (Secretariat) Monitored during work hours.

Fax: +32-2-733-56-16 Must phone prior to sending a fax.

E-mail: Permanence@fccu.be 24 hours a day, 7 days a week

(Must phone prior to sending an e-mail).

In accordance with Article 42 and Article 14, paragraph 3.a, of the Convention, Australia reserves the right to apply the measures referred to in Article 20 (Real-time collection of traffic data) only to offences that are punishable by imprisonment for at least 3 years and any other 'serious offences' as defined under domestic law governing the collection and recording of traffic data in real time and the interception of content data. Under Australian law, domestic agencies may only gain access to traffic data collected and recorded in real time in relation to offences that are punishable by imprisonment for at least 3 years and other 'serious offences'.

Domestic agencies may only gain access to intercepted content data in relation to 'serious offences'.

In accordance with Article 42 and Article 22, paragraph 2, of the Convention, Australia reserves the right not to apply the jurisdiction rules laid down in Article 22, paragraph 1.b-d, to offences established in accordance with Article 7 (Computer-related forgery), Article 8 (Computer-related fraud) and Article 9 (Offences related to child pornography). The Parliament of the Commonwealth of Australia does not enjoy a plenary power to make laws establishing offences for computer-related forgery, computer-related fraud or offences related to child pornography. The Parliament of the Commonwealth of Australia has established offences for computer-related forgery, computer-related fraud and offences related to child pornography, committed on board ships flying Australian flags, on board aircraft registered under Australian law, or by Australian nationals outside Australia, where the offending conduct involves some subject matter with respect to which it has legislative power. In addition to those offences, the Australian States and Territories have also established offences in accordance with Articles 7, 8 and 9 when commited on their territory.

In accordance with Article 42 and Article 22, paragraph 2, of the Convention, Australia further reserves the right not to apply the jurisdiction rules laid down in Article 22, paragraphs 1.b-d, to offences established in accordance with Article 10 (Offences related to infringements of copyright and related rights). Autralian law does not presently provide jurisdiction over acts constituting infringements of copyright and related rights committed on board ships flying Australian flags, on board aircraft registered under Australian law, or by Australian nationals outside Australia.

Article 24(7) - Australia's Designated Competent Authority:

International Crime Cooperation Central Authority

Attorney-General's Department

3-5 National Circuit

Barton ACT 2600

Australia

E-Mail: extradition@ag.gov.au

Tel: + 61 2 6141 3244

Fax: + 61 2 6141 5457

Article 27(2) - Australia's Designated Competent Authority:

International Crime Cooperation Central Authority

Attorney-General's Department

3-5 National Circuit

Barton ACT 2600

Australia

E-Mail: mutualassistance@ag.gov.au

Tel: + 61 2 6141 3244

Fax: + 61 2 6141 5457

Article 35 - 24/7 Network:

AOCC Watchfloor Operations

Australian Federal police

GPO Box 401

Canberra ACT 2601

Australia

E-Mail: AOCC-Watchfloor-Supervisor@afp.gov.au

Tel: + 61 2 6126 7299

Fax: + 61 2 6126 7910

The Dominican competent authorities as provided for by Articles 24(7) and 27(2) of the Convention are:

Procuraduría General de la República:

Ave. Jinénez Moya esq. Juan Ventura Simó,

Palacio de Justicia,

Centro de los Héroes, Constanza, Maimón y Estero Hondo,

Santo Domingo, Distrito Nacional,

República Dominicana.

Departamento de Investigaciones de Crímenes y Delitos de Alta Tecnología de la Policía Nacional

(DICAT):

Palacio de la Polícia,

Ave. Leopoldo Navarro No. 402,

Santo Domingo, Distrito Nacional,

República Dominicana.

The Dominican competent authority as provided for by Article 35 of the Convention is:

Departamento de Investigaciones de Crímenes y Delitos de Alta Tecnología de la Policía Nacional

(DICAT):

Palacio de la Polícia,

Ave. Leopoldo Navarro No. 402,

Santo Domingo, Distrito Nacional,

República Dominicana.

In accordance with Article 29, paragraph 4, and Article 42 of the Convention, the Czech Republic reserves the right to refuse a request for preservation under Article 29 of the Convention in cases where it has reasons to believe that condition of dual criminality in relation to other criminal acts than those specified under Articles 2 to 11 of the Convention, cannot be fulfilled to execute mutual assistance for the search or similar access, seizure or similar securing, or disclosure of the data.

In accordance with Article 2 and Article 40 of the Convention, the Czech Republic declares that criminal liability for acts described in Article 2 of the Convention occurs upon infringing security measures in order to gain unauthorised access to the whole or any part of a computer system.

In accordance with Article 27, paragraph 9(e), of the Convention, the Czech Republic declares that for reasons of efficiency, requests made under this paragraph are to be addressed to its central authorities.

In accordance with Article 24, paragraph 7(a), of the Convention, the authority responsible for making or receiving requests for extradition or provisional arrest in the absence of a treaty is the Ministry of Justice of the Czech Republic (Vyšehradská 16, 128 10 Prague 2)

In accordance with Article 27, paragraph 2(a), of the Convention, the central authority responsible for sending and answering requests for mutual assistance, the execution of such requests or their transmission to the authorities competent for their execution is the Supreme Prosecutor's Office of the Czech Republic for requests originating from pre-trial proceedings and the Ministry of Justice of the Czech Republic for other requests: Supreme Prosecutor's Office of the Czech Republic

Jezuitská 4

660 55 Brno

Czech Republic

Phone: +420 542 512 330

Fax: +420 542 512 350

E-mail: podatelna@nsz.brn.justice.cz

Ministry of Justice of the Czech Republic

Vyšehradská 16

128 10 Prague 2

Czech Republic

Phone: +420 221 997 435

Fax: +420 221 997 986

E-mail: mot@msp.justice.cz

In accordance with Article 35 of the Convention, the following authority is designated as the contact point:

Police Presidium of the Czech Republic

Bureau of Criminal Police and Investigation Service

Information Technology Crime Section

Strojnická 27

P.O. Box 62/KPV

170 89 Prague 7

Czech Republic

Contact in working hours (7:30 - 15:30):

Phone: + 420 974 834 550

Mobile: +420 603 190 057

Fax: +420 974 834 708

E-mail: contact@mvcr.cz

Contact outside working hours (24/7 service):

Phone: +420 974 834 380

Fax: +420 974 834 716

E-mail: contact@mvcr.cz

In accordance with Article 43, paragraph 1, of the Convention, the Czech Republic wishes to withdraw its reservation concerning Article 29 of the Convention, made in accordance with the provisions of Article 42 of the Convention.

Date of effect of the withdrawal of the reservation: 5 July 2019.

In line with the relevant provisions of the Convention on Cybercrime, the Ministry of Foreign Affairs, Regional Integration and International Trade of the Republic of Mauritius wishes to inform of the following designations by the authorities in Mauritius:

As per Article 24, paragraph 7(a), the Prime Minister's Office, Government Centre, Port Louis, as the authority responsible for making or receiving requests for extradition or provisional arrest in the absence of a treaty.

As per Article 27, paragraph 2, the central authorities responsible for sending and answering requests for mutual assistance, the execution of such requests or their transmission to the authorities competent for their execution will be:

As per Article 35, Mrs Bhooneshwari Kissoon-Luckputtya, Assistant Permanent Secretary, will be the focal point and contact available on a 24-hour, seven-day basis, in order to ensure the provision of immediate assistance for the purpose of investigations or proceedings concerning criminal offences related to computer systems and data etc.:

E-mail: bkissoon-luckputtya@mail.gov.mu

Phone No: Office: +(230) 210 0201

Mobile: +(230) 59269289

In accordance with the provisions of Article 24, paragraph 7.a, of the Convention, the authority responsible for making or receiving requests for extradition or provisional detention is the Ministry of Foreign Affairs, with the following address:

Ministry of Foreign Affairs

General Directorate of Legal Affairs and Treaties

Bolívar Palace

Calle Tercera, San Felipe

Phone: (507) 511-4228; (507) 511-4230; (507) 511-4225 and (507) 511-4234

Fax: (507)511-4008

Email: vfranco@mire.gob.pa; oescartin@mire.gob.pa and mlucas@mire.gob.pa.

In accordance with the provisions of Article 27, paragraph 2.a, of the Convention, the Government of the Republic of Panama has designated the following central authorities to submit, respond to and execute requests for mutual assistance:

Office of the Attorney General

Prosecutor's Office of International Affairs

Avenida Perú and Calle 33 A (in front of Parque Porras)

Phone: (507) 507-3018

Fax: (507) 507-3421

Senior Prosecutor's Office specialised in crimes against Intellectual Property and Information security,

Via Espana, Avesa Building, Floor No. 3

Phone: (507) 505-3255 and (507) 505-3298

Fax: (507) 505-3246

Email: fepisi@procuraduria.gob.pa

In accordance with Article 35 - 24/7 Network, the Government of the Republic of Panama has designated the Judicial Investigation Department of the National Police - INTERPOL National Central Bureau - Panama, with the following address:

Judicial Investigation Unit

National Central Bureau of Interpol - Panama

Ancon, Building No.424, between Omar Torrijos avenue and Venao street, next to the Omar Torrijos Foundation

Phone: tele-fax (507) 512-2415 and (507) 512-2267

Email: interpolpanama@hotmail.com; interpol.dij@policia.gob.pa

The Government of Luxembourg designates the following autorities:

Permanence Prosecutor's Office:

Week-days: 9:00 - 17:00: direct line: +352 - 47 40 76

Week-days: 17:00 - 9:00: Police central 113, who will notify the magistrate on duty.

Week-end and bank holiday: 113

E-Mail of the competent substitute for cybercrime:

gilles.hermann@justice.etat.lu

In accordance with Article 40 and Article 2 of the Convention, the Republic of Turkey declares that it requires that the offences be commited by infringing security measures, with the intention of obtaining computer data or other dishonest intent, or in relation to a computer system that is connected to another computer system.

In accordance with Article 40 and Article 7 of the Convention, the Republic of Turkey declares that the offence set forth in Article 7 regarding computer-related forgery requires an intent to defraud or similar dishonest intent under Turkish Law.

In accordance with Article 42 and Article 14, paragraph 3(b), of the Convention, the Repubic of Turkey reserves the right not to apply the measures referred in Article 20 and Article 21 to communications being transmitted within a computer system if the system is being operated for the benefit of a closed groupe of users and does not employ public communications networks and is not connected with any other public or private computer system.

In accordance with Article 42 and Article 22 of the Convention, the Repubic of Turkey reserves the right to establish jurisdiction within the scope of Article 11 and 13 of the Turkish Criminal Law when the offence is committed by a Turkish national outside its sovereign territory.

In accordance with Article 42 and Article 29, paragraph 4, of the Convention, the Republic of Turkey reserves the right to decline the request for preservation of data under this article in cases where it has reasons to believe that at the time of the disclosure of stored computer data the condition of dual criminality cannot be fulfilled.

In accordance with Article 24, paragraph 7(a), of the Convention, the Republic of Turkey designates the Ministry of Justice as the authority responsible for making or receiving requests for extradition or provisional arrest, in the absence of an extradition treaty.

In accordance with Article 27, paragraph 2(c), of the Convention, the Republic of Turkey designates the Ministry of Justice as the central authority responsible for sending and answering requests for mutual assistance, the execution of such requests or their transmission to the authorities competent for their execution.

In accordance with Article 35, paragraph 1, of the Convention, the Republic of Turkey designates as point of contact available on a twenty-four hour, seven-days-a-week basis:

Turkish National Police

Department of Cybercrime

Kizilirmak Mah. Anadolu Bulvari 2185.Sk. No: 14

06520 Sögütözü-Çankaya / ANKARA

siber@egm.gov.tr

In accordance with Article 42 and Article 6, paragraph 3, of the Convention, Sri Lanka reserves the right not to apply paragraph 1 of Article 6, with the exception of paragraph 1(a)(ii) of the said Article.

In accordance with Article 42 and Article 9, paragraph 4, of the Convention, Sri Lanka reserves the right not to apply sub-paragraphs 1(d) and (e) and sub-paragraph 2(b) and (c).

The competent authorities of Sri Lanka under Articles 24(7), 27(2) and Article 35 of the Convention are as follow:

Article 24(7)

The Secretary

Ministry of Law & Order

Floor – 13, ‘Sethsiripaya’ (Stage II)

Battaramulla,

Sri Lanka.

Phone: +94 112 186101 – 4

Fax: +94 112 186162 and 112 186109

info@lawandorder.lk

Article 27(2)

The Secretary

Ministry of Justice, Superior Courts Complex

P.o. Box 555

Colombo 12, Sri Lanka

Contact Nos.: (94) 112 323979 and (94) 112 449954

Fax: (94) 112 445447

Article 35

Senior DIG (Administration)

Police Department, Police Headquarters

P.O. Box 517,

Colombo 1, Sri Lanka

Contact Nos.: (94) 112 391301 and (94) 112 439092

Fax: (94) 112 446617

Email address: sdig.admin@police.lk nawait@police.lk with copy to: cybercrime@police.lk

Pursuant to Articles 24 (Extradition) and 27 (Procedures pertaining to mutual assistance requests) of the Convention on Cybercrime, Sri Lanka updates the contact information on its competent national authorities as follows:

Article 24

Ministry of Public Security

[…]

Article 27

Ministry of Justice, Prison Affairs and Constitutional Reforms

[…]

In accordance with Article 10, paragraph 3 and Article 42 of the Convention, Canada reserves the right not to impose criminal liability under paragraphs 1 and 2 of Article 10 since effective remedies, such as civil remedies, are available under Canadian law.

In accordance with Article 22, paragraph 2 and Article 42 of the Convention, Canada reserves the right not to exert its jurisdiction in relation to its nationals who commit offences established in accordance with the Convention outside its territorial jurisdiction.

In accordance with Articles 2 and 40 of the Convention, Canada will require that the offence be committed with dishonest intent.

In accordance with Articles 3 and 40 of the Convention, Canada will require that the offence be committed with dishonest intent.

In accordance with Articles 27 and 40 of the Convention, Canada declares that all requests for mutual assistance be addressed to its central authority.

For the purpose of Articles 24, 27 and 40 of the Convention, Canada designates as its central authority for extradition and mutual assistance, the International Assistance Group of the Department of Justice.

International Assistance Group

Department of Justice

284 Wellington Street

Ottawa, Ontario

Canada K1A 0H8

Tel: (613) 957-4832

Fax: (613) 957-8412

Email: Cdncentralauthority@justice.gc.ca

In accordance with Article 35 of the Convention, Canada designates the Royal Canadian Mounted Police as its point of contact that is available on a twenty-four hour, seven day-a-week basis.

Royal Canadian Mounted

National Operations Centre (NOC)

Ottawa, ON

Tel: 1-613-993-4460

Fax: 1-613-993-0260

Email: TechCrimeBranch-OPSMailbox@rcmp-grc.gc.ca

In accordance with Article 14, paragraph 3, of the Convention, Liechtenstein reserves the right to apply the measures referred to in Article 20 only to crimes and offences that are punishable by imprisonment for more than one year, as they are defined by the Liechtenstein Criminal Code.

Liechtenstein will, in accordance with Article 29, paragraph 4, of the Convention, refuse a request for mutual assistance to order the preservation of stored computer data, as provided for under Article 16 of the Convention, if the condition of dual criminality is not fulfilled; this does not apply to the offences established in accordance with Articles 2 through 11 of this Convention.

Liechtenstein declares that according to Article 24, paragraph 7, of the Convention, the member of Government responsible for the Ministry of Justice decides about sending and receiving requests for extradition or provisional arrest.

In accordance with Article 27, paragraph 2, of the Convention, the Office of Justice is the authority responsible for sending and receiving legal requests for mutual assistance:

Office of Justice of the Principality of Liechtenstein

Äulestrasse 70 Postfach 684 9490 Vaduz

Principality of Liechtenstein

Tel: +423 236 62 00

Fax: +423 236 75 81

E-Mail: info.aju@llv.li

Liechtenstein declares that mutual assistance requests and annexed documents are, if they are not in German language, be accompanied by a translation into German or English.

Liechtenstein declares that in case of emergency, within the context of Article 27, paragraph 9, of the Convention, the Office of Justice, Äulestrasse 70, Postfach 684, 9490 Vaduz, is the central authority to which all requests to Liechtenstein for mutual assistance must be addressed.

Liechtenstein declares that the following authority has been designated as point of contact pursuant to Article 35 of the Convention:

International Police Cooperation Liechtenstein

National Police

9490 Vaduz Principality of Liechtenstein

Tel: +423 236 79 79

Fax: +423 236 79 70

E-Mail: ipk.lp@llv.li (unsecured) and ncb.vaduz@li.igcs.int (Interpol-secured)

24 hours a day, 7 days a week

Alternative point of contact:

Emergency Call and Dispatch Center of the National Police

Tel: +423 236 71 11

24 hours a day, 7 days a week

In accordance with Article 6, paragraph 3, and Article 42 of the Convention, the State of Israel reserves the right not to apply Article 6, paragraph 1, when the offence concerns procurement for use or import, as they refer to Article 6, paragraphs 1.a.i and 1.a.ii.

In accordance with Article 6, paragraph 3, and Article 42 of the Convention, the State of Israel reserves the right not to apply Article 6, paragraph 1.b, regarding the possession of items designated in paragraph 1.a.ii.

In accordance with Article 9, paragraph 4, and Article 42 of the Convention, for the purposes of Article 9, paragraphs 1.a and 1.e, the State of Israel reserves the right not to apply Article 9, paragraph 2.b.

In accordance with Article 9, paragraph 4, and Article 42 of the Convention, the State of Israel reserves the right not to apply Article 9, paragraph 1.d.

In accordance with Article 10, paragraph 3, and Article 42 of the Convention, the State of Israel reserves the right not to impose criminal liability broader than provided for in the TRIPS Agreement.

In accordance with Article 14, paragraph 3, and Article 42 of the Convention, the State of Israel reserves the right to apply the measures referred to in Article 21 only to offences defined as felonies in the Israeli Penal Law 1977.

In accordance with Article 22, paragraph 2, and Article 42 of the Convention, the State of Israel reserves the right not to apply Article 22, paragraph 1.d, unless the offence is punishable under criminal law in the country where it was committed, in accordance with the limits of dual criminality and with the approval of the Attorney General of Israel.

In accordance with Article 29, paragraph 4, and Article 42 of the Convention, in respect of offences other than those established in accordance with Articles 2 through 11 of the Convention, the State of Israel reserves the right to refuse the request for preservation under Article 29 in cases where it has reasons to believe that at the time of disclosure the condition of dual criminality cannot be fulfilled.

The Israeli competent authority, in accordance with Article 24, paragraph 7.a, of the Convention, responsible for making or receiving requests for extradition or provisional arrests in the absence of a treaty, is:

Department of International Affairs,

Israeli State attorney's office.

The Ministry of Justice.

Contact and Telephone Number:

Tel: +972-2- 5419629

Fax: +972-2- 5419644

Email: dia@justice.gov.il

The Israeli competent authority, in accordance with Article 27, paragraphs 2.a and c, of the Convention, responsible for sending and answering requests for mutual assistance, is:

Legal Assistance to Foreign Countries department

Office of the Legal Advisor,

The Administration of Courts

Contact and Telephone Number:

Liat Yassim. Adv.

Tel: +972-2-6556938/19

Fax: +972-2-6556887

Email: laity@court.gov.il

The Israeli competent authority, in accordance with Article 35, paragraph 1, of the Convention, designated as Point of contact available on a twenty-four-hour, seven-day-a-week basis, for provision of immediate assistance for the purpose of investigations or proceedings concerning criminal offences related to computer system and data, or for the collection of evidence in electronic form of criminal offence is:

LAHAV 433 UNIT (National Unit),

the Israel Police

Contact and Telephone Number:

Operation Desk

Tel: +972-8-9545444/5/6

Fax: +972-8-9545580

E-Mail: cybercrime24x7@poIice.gov.il

Head of the National Cybercrime Unit, Chief Superintendent Meir Hayun

Tel: +972-8-9545060

Fax: +972-8-6476044

E-Mail: meirh@police.gov.il

Pursuant to Article 2 of the Convention, the Principality of Andorra declares that it will incriminate the conducts provided for in Article 2 when committed with criminal intent in order to obtain data without being entitled thereto, to alter or damage data or programs of a computer system, or with any other criminal intent.

In accordance with Article 6, paragraph 3, of the Convention, the Principality of Andorra reserves the right not to apply Article 6, paragraph 1.a, on the procurement of devices for use and Article 6, paragraph 1.b, with respect to possession of any of the items referred to in subparagraphs a.i or a.ii.

In accordance with Article 9, paragraph 4, of the Convention, the Principality of Andorra reserves the right not to apply Article 9, paragraph 2.b, related to a person appearing to be a minor engaged in sexually explicit conduct, and also the right not to apply Article 9, paragraph 2.c, related to realistic images representing a minor engaged in sexually explicit conduct.

In accordance with Article 11, paragraph 3, of the Convention, the Principality of Andorra reserves the right not to apply Article 7 concerning certain forms of attempted computer-related forgery.

In accordance with Article 14, paragraph 3.a, of the Convention, the Principality of Andorra reserves the right to apply the measures provided for in Article 20 of the Convention only to major offenses as defined in the Criminal Code in force.

In accordance with Article 29, paragraph 4, of the Convention, the Principality of Andorra declares that, in respect of offences other than those established in accordance with Articles 2 through 11 of the Convention, it will accept requests for mutual assistance aiming to order the preservation of stored computer data, as provided for in Article 16 of the Convention, only if the condition of dual criminality is fulfilled at the moment of the request.

In accordance with Article 24, paragraph 7, of the Convention, the Principality of Andorra declares that, in the absence of a treaty, the authority responsible for making or receiving requests for extradition or provisional arrest is:

Service des Affaires générales et juridiques

Ministry for Foreign Affairs

In accordance with Article 27, paragraph 2, of the Convention, the Principality of Andorra declares that the central authority responsible for sending and answering requests for mutual assistance and for their transmission to the authorities competent for their execution is:

The Ministry of Justice, Social and Interior affairs

In accordance with Article 35 of the Convention, the Principality of Andorra designates as point of contact available on a twenty-four hour, seven-day-a-week basis the following Department:

Police Department

In accordance with Article 24, paragraph 7, and Article 27, paragraph 2, of the Convention, Senegal declares that the authority responsible for making or receiving requests for extradition or provisional arrest, as well as for sending and answering requests for mutual assistance, the execution of such requests or their transmission to the authorities competent for their execution is:

La Direction des Affaires criminelles et des Grâces du Ministère de la Justice (DACG)

Ministry of Justice

In accordance with Article 35 of the Convention, Senegal declares that the point of contact available on a twenty-four hour, seven-day-a-week basis is

La Brigade spéciale de Lutte contre la Cybercriminalité de la Police nationale (BSLC)

In accordance with Article 42 and Article 14, paragraph 3, of the Convention, the Hellenic Republic reserves the right to apply the measures referred to in Article 20 (Real-time collection of traffic data) only to offences to which the measures referred to in Article 21 (interception of content data) apply.

In accordance with Article 42 and Article 29, paragraph 4, of the Convention, the Hellenic Republic reserves the right to refuse a request for preservation under Article 29 in cases where the condition of dual criminality is not fulfilled.

The Hellenic Republic designates as the authority responsible under Article 24 and 27 of the Convention for making or receiving requests for extradition or provisional arrest in the absence of a treaty and for sending and answering requests for mutual assistance and for the execution of such requests or their transmission to the competent authorities, the following authority:

Ministry of Justice, Transparency and Human Rights

Directorate of Legislative Work, International Relations and International Judicial Co-operation

Department of International Jjudicial Co-operation in Civil and Criminal Cases The Hellenic Republic designates as a point of contact available on a twenty-four hour, seven-days-a-week basis in accordance with Article 35 of the Convention:

Hellenic Police Headquarters / Cyber-crime Division

In accordance with Article 24, paragraph 7, of the Convention, the Principality of Monaco declares that the authority responsible for making or receiving requests for extradition or provisional arrest in the absence of a treaty is:

The Directorate of Judicial Services

In accordance with Article 27, paragraph 2, of the Convention, the Principality of Monaco declares that the authority responsible for sending and answering requests for mutual assistance and for their transmission to the authorities competent for their execution is:

The Directorate of Judicial Services

In accordance with Article 35 of the Convention, the Principality of Monaco designates as point of contact available on a twenty-four hour, seven-day-a-week basis the following service:

International Cooperation Service

Directorate of Public Security of Monaco

Monaco communicates the following precisions regarding the point of contact available on a twenty-four hour, seven-day-a-week basis, in accordance with Article 35 of the Convention on Cybercrime:

Description of the point of contact:

INTERPOL Office

Head of Section of international Cooperation

Judicial Police Division

Communication languages: French - English.

Information to be communicated by foreign judicial authorities:

Qualification of the offence (ex. terrorism, organised crime, fraud, moral or personal offences, invasion of privacy) and judicial framework (ex. preliminary investigation, reference to prosecuting authorities or investigating Judge, international investigation with international letters rogatory).

Time zone: H24 but preferably time zone Paris - 9:00 to 18:00

Other information susceptible to favour the cooperation:

Precisely specify technical information, logs and any e-mail address, internet link relevant to the current investigation.

Date of effect of the declaration: 17 October 2017

The Republic of Chile declares that it will require that the offense be committed with a specified dishonest intent, to punish the actions described in Articles 2 and 3 of the Convention on Cybercrime, in accordance with the provisions of Article 2 of Law No. 19.223 on computer-related offenses.

The Republic of Chile declares that it will require that the offense be committed with fraudulent intent and that it causes harm to third parties, to punish the actions described in Article 7 of the Convention on Cybercrime in accordance with the provisions of Article 197 of the Criminal Code.

The Republic of Chile declares that, in accordance with Article 4, paragraph 2, of the Convention on Cybercrime, it will establish as criminal offences under its domestic law, any deliberate and illegitimate act causing the damaging, deletion, deterioration, alteration or suppression of computer data without right, providing that this conduct results in serious harm.

The Republic of Chile declares that, in accordance with Article 6, paragraph 3, of the Convention on Cybercrime, it will not apply paragraph 1 a) i) of the same Article insofar as it does not concern the sale, distribution or otherwise making available of the items referred to in paragraph 1 a) ii) of said Article 6.

The Republic of Chile declares that, in accordance with Article 9, paragraph 4, of the Convention on Cybercrime, it will not apply paragraph 2, sub-paragraphs b and c of the same article.

The Republic of Chile declares that, in accordance with Article 22, paragraph 2, of the Convention on Cybercrime, it will not apply the jurisdiction rules laid down in paragraph 1.d of the same article.

The Republic of Chile, in respect of Article 29, paragraph 4, of the Convention on Cybercrime, reserves the right to refuse the request for international assistance in cases where the conduct is not defined under Chilean law at the time of the request.

The Republic of Chile declares that, under Article 24 "Extradition", paragraph 7, of the Convention, the authority responsible for making or receiving requests for extradition or provisional arrest is:

The Ministry of Foreign Affairs of the Republic of Chile

The Republic of Chile declares that, as regards to Article 27 “Procedures pertaining to mutual assistance requests in the absence of applicable international agreements”, paragraph 2.a, the central authority responsible for sending and answering requests for mutual assistance, the execution of such requests or their transmission to the authorities competent for their execution is:

The Office of Public Prosecution of Chile

International Cooperation and Extradition Unit

The Republic of Chile declares that, as regards to Article 35 “24/7 Network”, paragraph 1, the point of contact available on a twenty-four hour, seven-day-a-week basis is:

The Office of Public Prosecution of Chile

International Cooperation and Extradition Unit.

The Kingdom of Tonga designates the following competent authorities in accordance with Articles 24, 27 and 35 of the Convention:

Article 24 – Extradition and Article 27 –Procedures pertaining to mutual assistance requests in the absence of applicable international agreements:

Mr ‘Asipeli ‘Aminiasi Kefu

Acting Attorney General and Director of Public Prosecutions

Attorney General’s Office

Article 35 – 24/7 Network:

Mr ‘Asipeli ‘Aminiasi Kefu

Acting Attorney General and Director of Public Prosecutions

Attorney General’s Office

Ms Vienna Leotrina Kinshasa Macomber

Crown Counsel

Attorney General’s Office

Deputy Police Commissioner ‘Unga Fa’aoa

Serious Organized Transnational Crime Unit

Tonga Police Headquarters

Longolongo

Superintendent Kalisi Nau Tohifolau

National Crime Commander

Serious Organized Transnational Crime Unit

Tonga Police Headquarters

Longolongo

Regarding Article 10 of the Convention on Cybercrime, the Republic of Costa Rica interprets that it is understood that the use of copyright of literary or artistic works obtained through a computer system will not be punishable when its purpose is not for profit, to the extent required for illustration purposes for teaching, as long as the said use is done in accordance with proper use, and mention is made of the source and the name of the author, if this author appears in the source. Similarly, the reproduction and digital storage of literary or artistic works obtained by students and academic staff by computer means solely for illustration for teaching purposes shall not be punishable.

Regarding Article 24 of the Convention on Cybercrime, the Republic of Costa Rica interprets that it is understood that it will not apply to extradition of Costa Rican nationals who are in the territory of Costa Rica.

The Republic of Costa Rica indicates that, in conformity with the provisions of the Convention on Cybercrime in its Article 35, it designates the Judicial Authority as contact point to ensure the provision of immediate assistance for the purpose of investigations or proceedings concerning criminal offences related to computer systems and data, or for the collection of evidence.

In accordance with the provisions of Articles 24 and 27 of the Convention on Cybercrime, the authority designated by the Republic of Costa Rica is as follows:

Authority: Oficina de Asesoría Técnica y Relaciones Internacionales

Fiscalía General de la República

In accordance with Articles 24, 27 and 35 of the Convention, the Republic of the Philippines designates the following authorities mainly responsible for making or receiving requests for extradition or for mutual assistance with another State Party:

Central authority:

Authority: Department of Justice

Point of contact 24/7 network:

Authority: Department of Justice - Office of Cybercrime

The Argentine Republic makes a reservation to Article 6.1.b of the Convention on Cybercrime and declares that it’s not transposable to its jurisdiction because it contains an anticipatory assumption of the sanction since preparatory actions are established as criminal offences, which is unknown in Argentina’s legislative tradition in criminal legal matters.

The Argentine Republic makes a reservation to Articles 9.1.d, 9.2.b and 9.2.c of the Convention on Cybercrime and declares that they are not transposable to its jurisdiction because they contain anticipatory assumptions inconsistent with the Criminal Code in force, in accordance with the reform introduced by Law 26.38.

The Argentine Republic makes a partial reservation to Article 9.1.e of the Convention on Cybercrime and declares that it’s not transposable to its jurisdiction because, in accordance with the legislation in force until this date, this article is only applicable when the manifest purpose of the possession in question is the distribution or commercialisation (Article 128, second paragraph, of the Criminal Code).

The Argentine Republic makes a reservation to Article 22.1.d of the Convention on Cybercrime and declares that it’s not transposable to its jurisdiction because its content differs from the rules governing the definition of national criminal jurisdiction.

The Argentine Republic makes a reservation to Article 29.4 of the Convention on Cybercrime and declares that it’s not transposable to its jurisdiction because the requirement of dual criminality is one of the fundamental bases of the Law on International Cooperation in Criminal Matters No. 24.767 for the kind of cooperation measures provided for in the article and paragraph mentioned.

In accordance with the provisions of Article 24.7 of the Convention, the Government of Argentina designates as responsible authority the Directorate for International Mutual Legal Assistance of the Ministry of Foreign Affairs and Worship of the Argentine Republic.

In accordance with the provisions of Article 27.2.c of the Convention, the Government of Argentina designates as responsible authority the Directorate for International Mutual Legal Assistance of the Ministry of Foreign Affairs and Worship of the Argentine Republic.

In accordance with Article 24, 27 and 35 of the Convention, the Republic of Cabo Verde designates the following authorities mainly responsible for making or receiving requests for extradition or for mutual assistance with another State Party:

Central authority:

Attorney General’s Office, Central Department of Cooperation and Compared Law

Point of contact 24/7 network

International Cooperation Office of the National Direction of Criminal Police

and

Central Department of Cooperation and Compared Law

In accordance with Article 24 (24.7.a and 24.7.b) and Article 27 of the Convention, the Government of Morocco declares that the authority responsible for making or receiving requests for extradition or provisional arrest and requests for mutual assistance, in the absence of a treaty, is:

Ministry of Justice

Direction des Affaires Pénales et des Grâces

In accordance with Article 35 of the Convention, the Government of Morocco declares that the points of contact 24/7 designated for the purpose of investigations related to Cybercrime are:

Bureau Central National d’Interpol Rabat

Direction de la Police Judiciaire,

Direction Générale de la Sûreté Nationale, Rabat

and

Présidence du Parquet Général

Pôle de Suivi des Affaires Pénales et de la Protection des Catégories Spéciales

In accordance with Article 24.7a of the Convention, the Government of Paraguay declares that the authority designated is:

Ministère Public

Direction des Affaires internationales et de Coopération juridique internationale

In accordance with Article 27.2a of the Convention, the Government of Paraguay declares that the authority designated is:

Ministère Public

Unité Spécialisée Délits Informatiques

In accordance with Article 35 of the Convention, the Government of Paraguay declares that the points of contact 24/7 designated for the purpose of investigations related to Cybercrime is:

Ministère Public

Unité Spécialisée Délits Informatiques

Pursuant to Articles 24 (Extradition) and 27 (Procedures pertaining to mutual assistance requests) of the Convention on Cybercrime, the Republic of Paraguay updates the contact information on its competent national authorities as follows:

Article 24

Public Prosecutor Manuel Doldan Breuer

[…]

Article 27

Public Prosecutor Manuel Doldan Breuer

[…]

The Ghanaian competent authority as provided for by Article 24 (7) of the Convention is:

The Attorney-General’s Department

Office of the Attorney-General and Ministry of Justice

The Ghanaian competent authority as provided for by Article 27 (2) of the Convention is:

The Attorney-General’s Department

Office of the Attorney-General and Ministry of Justice

The Ghanaian competent authorities as provided for by Article 27 (2) of the Convention are:

The National Cyber Security Centre (NCSC)

Ghana Emergency Command Centre

Bureau of National Communications (BNC)

National Security Council Secretariat

Pursuant to paragraph 7 of Article 24 of the Convention, the Republic of San Marino hereby declares that the Authority responsible for making or receiving requests for extradition or provisional arrest in the absence of a treaty is:

Segreteria di Stato per la Giustizia (Ministry of Justice)

Pursuant to paragraph 2 of Article 27 of the Convention, the Republic of San Marino hereby declares that the Central Authority responsible for sending and answering requests for mutual assistance, the execution of such requests or their transmission to the authorities competent for their execution is:

Segreteria di Stato per gli Affari Esteri (Ministry of Foreign Affairs)

In accordance with paragraph 1 of Article 35 of the Convention, the Republic of San Marino hereby declares that the point of contact is:

ICPO INTERPOL – NCB

In accordance with Article 2 of the Convention on Cybercrime, the Republic of Peru declares that its national law requires the offense of illegal access to be committed in violation of security measures.

In accordance with Article 3 of the Convention on Cybercrime, the Republic of Peru declares that its national law requires the offense of illegal interception is committed with criminal intent and that such offense may be committed in relation to a computer system connected to another computer system.

In accordance with Article 7 of the Convention on Cybercrime, the Republic of Peru declares that it may require that a similar fraudulent or criminal intent exists, in accordance with the provisions of its national law, so that the conduct described in that article engenders a criminal responsibility.

In accordance with Article 27, paragraph 9, sub-paragraph (e) of the Convention on Cybercrime, the Republic of Peru declares that in the interest of efficiency, the requests made under provisions of Article 27, paragraph 9, of the Convention should be addressed to its Central Authority.

In accordance with Article 6, paragraph 3, of the Convention on Cybercrime, the Republic of Peru reserves the right not to apply Article 6, paragraph 1, sub-paragraph (b) of the Convention.

In accordance with Article 9, paragraph 4, of the Convention on Cybercrime, the Republic of Peru considers that the protected legal property in the national law with respect to child pornography is the freedom and/or sexual indemnity of a minor, based on which it makes a reservation to paragraph 2, sub-paragraphs b) and c) because the conducts referred to in such provisions does not involve the participation of a minor

In accordance with Article 29, paragraph 4, of the Convention on Cybercrime, the Republic of Peru reserves the right to refuse the request for preservation under this article in case where it has reasons to believe that at the time of disclosure the condition of dual criminality cannot be fulfilled.

The Republic of Peru declares that the following authority has been designated as responsible pursuant to Article 24, paragraph 7, Article 27, paragraph 2 and Article 35 of the Convention on Cybercrime:

Unidad de Cooperación Judicial Internacional y Extraditiones del Ministerio Público

In accordance with Article 14, paragraph 3, and with reference to Articles 20 and 21 of the Convention, Colombia reserves the right to apply the measures referred to in the aforementioned articles in accordance with its internal regulations in matters of personal data and protection of the right to privacy.

In accordance with Article 24 of the Convention, Colombia designates as competent authority in matters of extradition the:

Directorate of International Legal Affairs of the Ministry of Foreign Affairs of Colombia

In accordance with Article 27 of the Convention, Colombia designates the following authorities as responsible for mutual legal assistance:

For mutual legal assistance during the investigation phase:

Department of International Affairs of the General Prosecutor's Office

For mutual legal assistance during the legalisation phase:

Department of International Affairs of the Ministry of Justice and Law

In accordance with article 35 of the Convention, Colombia designates as the contact point 24 hours a day, seven days a week:

National Police - Colombian Cybercrime Competence Center C4

In accordance with Article 14, paragraph 3.a, of the Convention, Sweden declares that it reserves the right to apply real time collection of traffic data only to offences and categories of offences specified in Chapter 27, Section 19, third paragraph of the Swedish Code of Judicial Procedure.

In accordance with Article 14, paragraph 3.b, of the Convention, Sweden declares that it reserves the right to apply real time collection of traffic data and interception of content data to communications being transmitted within a computer system of a service provider, which system is being operated for the benefit of a closed group of users, and does not employ public communications networks and is not connected with another computer system.

In accordance with Article 29, paragraph 4, of the Convention, Sweden declares that it reserves the right to refuse a request for mutual assistance with preservation of stored computer data in cases where there is reasons to believe that at the time of disclosure the condition of dual criminality cannot be fulfilled.

In accordance with Article 24, paragraph 7.a, of the Convention, Sweden designates as the authority responsible for making or receiving requests for extradition or provisional arrest in the absence of a treaty:

Ministry of Justice

Division for Criminal Cases and International Judicial Co-operation

Central Authority

[…]

In accordance with Article 27, paragraph 2, of the Convention, Sweden designates as the central authority for sending and answering requests for mutual assistance, the execution of such requests or their transmission to the authorities competent for their execution:

Ministry of Justice

Division for Criminal Cases and International Judicial Co-operation

Central Authority

[…]

Pursuant to Articles 10 and 42 of the Convention, Nigeria reserves the right to impose other effective remedies in lieu of criminal liability under Article 10, paragraphs 1 and 2, to the extent the criminalization of such infringements is not required pursuant to the obligations Nigeria has undertaken under the agreements referenced in paragraphs 1 and 2.

In accordance with Article 14, paragraph 3, and Article 42 of the Convention, Nigeria reserves the right to apply the measures referred to in Articles 20 to 21 only on the basis of religious offences or the decision of a competent court, if it is necessary for conducting a criminal investigation or for reasons of safety in Nigeria.

In accordance with Article 29, paragraph 4, of the Convention, Nigeria reserves the right not to apply Article 29 where execution of the request for preservation requires the exercise of coercive powers and where dual criminality cannot be established.

Pursuant to Articles 41 and 42 of the convention, Nigeria reserves the right to assume obligations under Chapter II of the Convention in a manner consistent with its fundamental principles of federalism.

Pursuant to Article 24, paragraph 7, and Article 27, paragraph 2, of the Convention, the designated Nigerian competent authority responsible for sending and answering requests for mutual assistance, the execution of such requests or their transmission to the authorities competent for their execution and extradition is: Central Authority Unit, Office of the Honourable Attorney General of the Federation and Minister of Justice [...].

Pursuant to Article 35 to the Convention, the Nigerian competent authorities designated as the point of contact available on a twenty-for hour, seven-day-a-week basis to ensure the provision of immediate assistance under the Convention are:

Pursuant to Article 24, paragraph 7.a, and Article 27, paragraph 2.c, of the Convention, the Federative Republic of Brazil declares that the authority responsible for making requests for extradition and provisional arrest and for exercising the function of competent central authority is:

Ministry of Justice and Public Security

Department of Asset Recovery and International Judicial Cooperation

Pursuant to Article 35 to the Convention, the Federative Republic of Brazil declares that the function of point of contact for the 24/7 Network will be exercised by the Federal Police.

Pursuant to Article 40 of the Convention, the Federative Republic of Brazil declares that no presentation of declaration was decided during the legislative process of approval.

Pursuant to Articles 24, 27 and 35 of the Convention, the Government of the Republic of Cameroon declares that:

In accordance with Articles 24, 27 and 35 of the Convention on Cybercrime, the Republic of Benin designates the competent national authorities for Benin as follows:

In accordance with Articles 24 (7), 27 (2) and 35 of the Convention on Cybercrime, the Republic of Fiji designates the competent national authorities for Fiji as follows:

Article 24(7)

Authority: Office of the Attorney-General Solicitor-General

[…]

Article 27(2)

Authority: Office of the Attorney-General Solicitor-General

[…]

Article 35

Authority: Head of the Cybercrime Unit

[…]

Authority: Office of the Director of Public Prosecutions

[…]

In accordance with Article 24, paragraph 7, of the Convention, Grenada declares that the name and address of the authorities responsible for making or receiving requests for extradition or provisional arrest in the absence of a treaty is:

Attorney General’s Chambers

Ministry of Legal Affairs, Labour and Consumer Affairs

[…]

In accordance with Article 27, paragraph 2, of the Convention, Grenada declares that the central authority responsible for sending and answering requests for mutual assistance and for their transmission to the authorities competent for their execution is:

Ministry of Foreign Affairs

[…]

In accordance with Article 35 of the Convention, Grenada designates as point of contact available on a twenty-four hours, seven-days-a-week the following Department:

Digital Forensic Unit

Royal Grenada Police Force

[…]

In accordance with Article 24, paragraph 7, of the Convention, Kiribati declares that the name and address of the authorities responsible for making or receiving request for extradition are:

Primary: The Attorney General – Office of the Attorney General

[…]

Secondary: Criminal Investigation Division, Interpol and Cybercrime Unit – Kiribati Police Service

[…]

In accordance with Article 27, paragraph 2, of the Convention, Kiribati declares that the central authority responsible for sending and answering requests for mutual assistance and their transmission to the authorities competent for their execution is:

The Attorney General – Office of the Attorney General

[…]

In accordance with Article 35 of the Convention, Kiribati designates as a point of contact available on a twenty-four hour, seven-day-a-week basis the following:

Criminal Investigation Division, Interpol and Cybercrime Unit – Kiribati Police Service

[…]

Pursuant to Articles 24 (Extradition) and 27 (Procedures pertaining to mutual assistance requests) of the Convention, the Republic of Sierra Leone designated as the competent national authority:

The Solicitor General, Office of the Attorney General and Ministry of Justice […]

Pursuant to Article 35 of the Convention, the Government of the Republic of Sierra Leone designated as national point of contact for cooperation in the fight against cybercrime, available 24 hours a day, seven days a week (24/7 network):

The National Cybersecurity Coordinator, National Cybersecurity Coordinator Center (NC3) […]

Pursuant to Articles 24 (Extradition) and 27 (Procedures pertaining to mutual assistance requests) of the Convention, the Tunisian Republic designated as the competent national authority:

La Direction générale des affaires judiciaires au sein du Ministère de la Justice […].

Pursuant to Article 35 of the Convention, the Government of the Tunisian Republic designated as national point of contact for cooperation in the fight against cybercrime, available 24 hours a day, seven days a week (24/7 network):

La Direction générale des services techniques au sein de la Direction générale de la sûreté nationale au Ministère de l’Intérieur […].