Einde inhoudsopgave
Principles of Transnational Civil Procedure
Officiële Toelichting
Geldend
Geldend vanaf 01-04-2004
- Redactionele toelichting
De dag van datum van afkondiging is gezet op 01.
- Bronpublicatie:
01-04-2004, Internet 2004, www.unidroit.org (uitgifte: 01-04-2004, kamerstukken/regelingnummer: -)
- Inwerkingtreding
01-04-2004
- Bronpublicatie inwerkingtreding:
01-04-2004, Internet 2004, www.unidroit.org (uitgifte: 01-04-2004, kamerstukken/regelingnummer: -)
- Vakgebied(en)
Civiel recht algemeen (V)
Internationaal privaatrecht / Algemeen
Burgerlijk procesrecht / Bijzondere onderwerpen
P-23A A written decision not only informs the parties of the disposition, but also provides a record of the judgment, which may be useful in subsequent recognition proceedings. In several systems a reasoned opinion is required by constitutional provisions or is considered as a fundamental guarantee in the administration of justice. The reasoned explanation may be given by reference to other documents such as pleadings in case of a default judgment or the transcript of the instructions to the ju ry in case of a jury verdict. Forum law may specify a time limit within which the court must give judgment.
P-23B When a judgment determines less than all the claims and defenses at issue, it should specify the matters that remain open for further proceedings. For example, in a case involving multiple claims, the court may decide one of the claims (damages, for example) and keep the proceedings open for the decision of the other (injunction, for example).
P-23C In some systems, a judgment may be pronounced subject to subsequent specification of the monetary award or other terms of a remedy, for example an accounting to determine damages or a specification of the terms of an injunction.
P-23D See Principle 5.6, requiring that the court consider each significant contention of fact, evidence, and law.