Einde inhoudsopgave
Principles of Transnational Civil Procedure
Officiële Toelichting
Geldend
Geldend vanaf 01-04-2004
- Redactionele toelichting
De dag van datum van afkondiging is gezet op 01.
- Bronpublicatie:
01-04-2004, Internet 2004, www.unidroit.org (uitgifte: 01-04-2004, kamerstukken/regelingnummer: -)
- Inwerkingtreding
01-04-2004
- Bronpublicatie inwerkingtreding:
01-04-2004, Internet 2004, www.unidroit.org (uitgifte: 01-04-2004, kamerstukken/regelingnummer: -)
- Vakgebied(en)
Civiel recht algemeen (V)
Internationaal privaatrecht / Algemeen
Burgerlijk procesrecht / Bijzondere onderwerpen
P-24A The proviso ‘while respecting the parties' opportunity to pursue litigation’ signifies that the court should not compel or coerce settlement among the parties. However, the court may conduct informal discussions of settlement with the parties at any appropriate times. A judge participating in settlement discussions should avoid bias. However, active participation, including a suggestion for settlement, does not impair a judge's impartiality or create an appearance of partiality.
P-24B Principle 24.3 departs from tradition in some countries in which the parties generally do not have an obligation to negotiate or otherwise consider settlement proposals from the opposing party. Forum law may appropriately provide settlement-offer procedure enforced by special cost sanctions for refusal to accept an opposing party's offer. Prominent examples of such procedures are the Ontario (Canada) civil-procedure rule and Part 36 of the new English procedural rules. Those are formal procedures whereby a party may make a definite offer of settlement and thereby oblige the opposing party to accept or refuse it on penalty of additional costs if that party does not eventually obtain a result more advantageous than the proposed settlement offer. See also Principle 25.2.