Einde inhoudsopgave
Draft Common Frame of Reference
60 Remedies for non-performance
Geldend
Geldend vanaf 01-01-2009
- Redactionele toelichting
De dag van de datum van afkondiging is gezet op 01. De datum van inwerkingtreding is de datum van afkondiging.
- Bronpublicatie:
01-01-2009, Internet 2009, ec.europa.eu (uitgifte: 01-01-2009, kamerstukken/regelingnummer: -)
- Inwerkingtreding
01-01-2009
- Bronpublicatie inwerkingtreding:
01-01-2009, Internet 2009, ec.europa.eu (uitgifte: 01-01-2009, kamerstukken/regelingnummer: -)
- Vakgebied(en)
Civiel recht algemeen (V)
EU-recht / Bijzondere onderwerpen
Internationaal privaatrecht / Algemeen
The Article on stipulated pay-ments for non-performance129. could be said to be more favourable to market efficiency than rules which regard penalty clauses as completely unenforceable.130. Questions might be asked about the second paragraph of the Article which allows a stipulated payment to be reduced to a reasonable amount when it is grossly excessive in relation to the loss resulting from the non-performance,131. but here there are considerations of justice to weigh in the balance. The allowance of damages for pure economic loss seems to be preferable from the point of view of efficiency to the denial of such recovery, as happens under some systems.132. It is difficult to see any justification for distinguishing between pure economic loss and loss caused by damage to property or injury to the person. The question of whether the other rules on damages are optimal from the point of view of general efficiency seems to be a matter of debate.133.
Voetnoten
See Schweizer, ‘Obligations and Remedies for non-Performance: Book III of the DCFR from an Economist's Perspective’ http://www.wipol.uni-bonn. de/fileadmin/Fachbereich_Wirtschaft/Einrichtungen/Wirtschaftspolitik/ Mitarbeiter/Prof._Dr._Urs_Schweizer/DCFRSchweizerRev.pdf; Ogus, ‘Measure of Damages, Expectation, Reliance and Opportunity Cost’ (publication forthcoming in the work cited in fn. 128).
Ibid.
Schweizer, cited above, at p.9.
See e. g. the differing views of Schweizer and Ogus cited above.