Overeenkomst van 's-Gravenhage betreffende het internationaal depot van tekeningen of modellen van nijverheid van 6 november 1925, herzien te Londen op 2 juni 1934 en te 's-Gravenhage op 28 november 1960, Partijen en gegevens (01-08-1984 tot ---)

Bronnen

Trb. 1961, 40

Trb. 1963, 188

Trb. 1969, 142

Trb. 1970, 185

Trb. 1979, 61

Trb. 1980, 34

Trb. 1983, 153

Trb. 1984, 100

Trb. 1986, 139

Trb. 1989, 53

Trb. 1996, 307

Trb. 1998, 279

Trb. 2015, 38

Partijen

Partij	Datum inwerkingtreding	Voorbehoud
Albanië	19-03-2007
België	01-08-1984	2, 8
Belize	12-07-2003
Benin	02-11-1986
Bulgarije	11-12-1996
de Duitse Democratische Republiek	07-05-1989	6, 9
Duitsland	01-08-1984	4, 6, 8
Frankrijk	01-08-1984	8
Gabon	18-08-2003
Georgië	01-08-2003
Griekenland	18-04-1997
Hongarije	01-08-1984	5, 12
Italië	13-06-1987	8, 11
Ivoorkust	30-05-1993
Kirgistan	17-03-2003
Kroatië	12-02-2004
Liechtenstein	01-08-1984
Luxemburg	01-08-1984	1
Mali	07-09-2006
Marokko	13-10-1999	15
Moldavië	14-03-1994
Monaco	01-08-1984	10
Mongolië	12-04-1997
Montenegro	03-06-2006	14
het Koninkrijk der Nederlanden (het Europese deel van Nederland)	01-08-1984	3, 7, 8
Niger	20-09-2004
Noord-Korea	27-05-1992
Noord-Macedonië	18-03-1997
Oekraïne	28-08-2002	16
Roemenië	18-07-1992
Senegal	01-08-1984
Servië	30-12-1993	7, 13
Slovenië	13-01-1995
Suriname	01-08-1984
Zwitserland	01-08-1984

Voorbehouden, verklaringen en bezwaren

1	De Regering van het Groothertogdom Luxemburg heeft op 22-02-1979 een mededeling als bedoeld in artikel 30 van de Overeenkomst gericht tot de Directeur-Generaal van de Wereldorganisatie voor de intellectuele eigendom, welke mededeling als volgt luidt: The Grand Duchy of Luxembourg has introduced the Uniform Benelux Designs Law into their national legislation by virtue of the provisions of the Benelux Designs Convention, signed at Brussels on October 25, 1966. In accordance with the provisions of Article 13 of the said Convention, the Convention entered into force on January 1, 1974, and the Uniform Law on January 1, 1975. Considering Article 30 of the Hague Agreement Concerning the International Deposit of Industrial Designs, as revised at The Hague on November 28, 1960, and amended by Article 7(3) of the Complementary Act of Stockholm of July 14, 1967, to the said Agreement. Considering Articles 5 and 8 of the Protocol of Geneva to the Hague Agreement Concerning the International Deposit of International Designs, of August 29, 1975. The Government of the Grand Duchy of Luxembourg has the honor to notify the Director General of the World Intellectual Property Organization of the following: 1. An Office common to the three Benelux countries (Belgium, Luxembourg, Netherlands) has been instituted under the name ‘Benelux Designs Office’. The seat of the Office is at The Hague (the Netherlands). The Benelux Designs Office was substituted for the national Office of each Benelux country as from January 1, 1975. 2. The application of the Convention referred to above shall be confined to the territories of the High Contracting Parties in Europe, in accordance with Article 11 thereof. These territories shall be deemed to be a single State for the application of Articles 2 to 17 of the 1960 Act of the Hague Agreement Concerning the International Deposit of Industrial Designs and for the application of Articles 2 and 3 of the 1975 Geneva Protocol to the said Agreement. One consequence of territorial unification to which attention should be drawn is that a renunciation – limited to part of the Benelux territory – of protection resulting from an international deposit shall be effective throughout that territory, notwithstanding any statement to the contrary made by the proprietor (Article 18(2) of the Uniform Benelux Law). Similarly, assignments or other transfers not made for the entire Benelux territory shall be null and void (Article 13 of the Uniform Benelux Law). In addition, no limitation of a license, other than a restriction as to its duration, shall have any effect regarding the application of the Uniform Law (Article 13(2) of the Uniform Benelux Law). The Benelux Designs office shall in future be entitled to receive payment on behalf of the three Countries of the fees referred to in Article 15, paragraph (1), item 2, of the 1960 Act of The Hague Agreement, which is applicable also by virtue of the 1975 Geneva Protocol, it being understood that those countries shall not be treated as separate countries for the application of the said provision. The three Governments shall demand to be officially notified of the total amounts distributed according to this procedure. 3. It is evident that the three Benelux countries shall remain three separate countries with respect to their representation in the Assembly of the Hague Special Union. They express the wish that their common Office, that is, the Benelux Designs Office, may be represented by its Director, in the capacity of observer in the said Assembly and at meetings concerning The Hague Union. 4. With a view to simplifying access to documentation concerning international deposits, Belgium and Luxembourg express the wish that publications and notifications from the International Bureau may be addressed also to their Industrial Property Services in Brussels and Luxembourg.
2	De Regering van het Koninkrijk België heeft op 22-02-1979 een mededeling als bedoeld in artikel 30 van de Overeenkomst gericht tot de Directeur-Generaal van de Wereldorganisatie voor de intellectuele eigendom, welke mededeling als volgt luidt: The Kingdom of Belgium has introduced the Uniform Benelux Designs Law into their national legislation by virtue of the provisions of the Benelux Designs Convention, signed at Brussels on October 25, 1966. In accordance with the provisions of Article 13 of the said Convention, the Convention entered into force on January 1, 1974, and the Uniform Law on January 1, 1975. Considering Article 30 of the Hague Agreement Concerning the International Deposit of Industrial Designs, as revised at The Hague on November 28, 1960, and amended by Article 7(3) of the Complementary Act of Stockholm of July 14, 1967, to the said Agreement. Considering Articles 5 and 8 of the Protocol of Geneva to the Hague Agreement Concerning the International Deposit of International Designs, of August 29, 1975. The Government of the Kingdom of Belgium has the honor to notify the Director General of the World Intellectual Property Organization of the following: 1. An Office common to the three Benelux countries (Belgium, Luxembourg, Netherlands) has been instituted under the name ‘Benelux Designs Office’. The seat of the Office is at The Hague (the Netherlands). The Benelux Designs Office was substituted for the national Office of each Benelux country as from January 1, 1975. 2. The application of the Convention referred to above shall be confined to the territories of the High Contracting Parties in Europe, in accordance with Article 11 thereof. These territories shall be deemed to be a single State for the application of Articles 2 to 17 of the 1960 Act of the Hague Agreement Concerning the International Deposit of Industrial Designs and for the application of Articles 2 and 3 of the 1975 Geneva Protocol to the said Agreement. One consequence of territorial unification to which attention should be drawn is that a renunciation – limited to part of the Benelux territory – of protection resulting from an international deposit shall be effective throughout that territory, notwithstanding any statement to the contrary made by the proprietor (Article 18(2) of the Uniform Benelux Law). Similarly, assignments or other transfers not made for the entire Benelux territory shall be null and void (Article 13 of the Uniform Benelux Law). In addition, no limitation of a license, other than a restriction as to its duration, shall have any effect regarding the application of the Uniform Law (Article 13(2) of the Uniform Benelux Law). The Benelux Designs office shall in future be entitled to receive payment on behalf of the three Countries of the fees referred to in Article 15, paragraph (1), item 2, of the 1960 Act of The Hague Agreement, which is applicable also by virtue of the 1975 Geneva Protocol, it being understood that those countries shall not be treated as separate countries for the application of the said provision. The three Governments shall demand to be officially notified of the total amounts distributed according to this procedure. 3. It is evident that the three Benelux countries shall remain three separate countries with respect to their representation in the Assembly of the Hague Special Union. They express the wish that their common Office, that is, the Benelux Designs Office, may be represented by its Director, in the capacity of observer in the said Assembly and at meetings concerning The Hague Union. 4. With a view to simplifying access to documentation concerning international deposits, Belgium and Luxembourg express the wish that publications and notifications from the International Bureau may be addressed also to their Industrial Property Services in Brussels and Luxembourg.
3	De Regering van het Koninkrijk der Nederlanden heeft op 22-02-1979 een mededeling als bedoeld in artikel 30 van de Overeenkomst gericht tot de Directeur-Generaal van de Wereldorganisatie voor de intellectuele eigendom, welke mededeling als volgt luidt: The Kingdom of the Netherlands has introduced the Uniform Benelux Designs Law into their national legislation by virtue of the provisions of the Benelux Designs Convention, signed at Brussels on October 25, 1966. In accordance with the provisions of Article 13 of the said Convention, the Convention entered into force on January 1, 1974, and the Uniform Law on January 1, 1975. Considering Article 30 of the Hague Agreement Concerning the International Deposit of Industrial Designs, as revised at The Hague on November 28, 1960, and amended by Article 7(3) of the Complementary Act of Stockholm of July 14, 1967, to the said Agreement. Considering Articles 5 and 8 of the Protocol of Geneva to the Hague Agreement Concerning the International Deposit of International Designs, of August 29, 1975. The Government of the Kingdom of the Netherlands has the honor to notify the Director General of the World Intellectual Property Organization of the following: 1. An Office common to the three Benelux countries (Belgium, Luxembourg, Netherlands) has been instituted under the name ‘Benelux Designs Office’. The seat of the Office is at The Hague (the Netherlands). The Benelux Designs Office was substituted for the national Office of each Benelux country as from January 1, 1975. 2. The application of the Convention referred to above shall be confined to the territories of the High Contracting Parties in Europe, in accordance with Article 11 thereof. These territories shall be deemed to be a single State for the application of Articles 2 to 17 of the 1960 Act of the Hague Agreement Concerning the International Deposit of Industrial Designs and for the application of Articles 2 and 3 of the 1975 Geneva Protocol to the said Agreement. One consequence of territorial unification to which attention should be drawn is that a renunciation – limited to part of the Benelux territory – of protection resulting from an international deposit shall be effective throughout that territory, notwithstanding any statement to the contrary made by the proprietor (Article 18(2) of the Uniform Benelux Law). Similarly, assignments or other transfers not made for the entire Benelux territory shall be null and void (Article 13 of the Uniform Benelux Law). In addition, no limitation of a license, other than a restriction as to its duration, shall have any effect regarding the application of the Uniform Law (Article 13(2) of the Uniform Benelux Law). The Benelux Designs office shall in future be entitled to receive payment on behalf of the three Countries of the fees referred to in Article 15, paragraph (1), item 2, of the 1960 Act of The Hague Agreement, which is applicable also by virtue of the 1975 Geneva Protocol, it being understood that those countries shall not be treated as separate countries for the application of the said provision. The three Governments shall demand to be officially notified of the total amounts distributed according to this procedure. 3. It is evident that the three Benelux countries shall remain three separate countries with respect to their representation in the Assembly of the Hague Special Union. They express the wish that their common Office, that is, the Benelux Designs Office, may be represented by its Director, in the capacity of observer in the said Assembly and at meetings concerning The Hague Union. 4. With a view to simplifying access to documentation concerning international deposits, Belgium and Luxembourg express the wish that publications and notifications from the International Bureau may be addressed also to their Industrial Property Services in Brussels and Luxembourg.’
4	Bekrachtiging onder de verklaring dat de Overeenkomst, het Protocol en het Reglement mede voor Berlijn (West) zullen gelden vanaf de datum waarop deze akten voor de Bondsrepubliek Duitsland in werking treden.
5	Toetreding door Hongarije onder de verklaring zich niet gebonden te achten aan het bij de Overeenkomst gevoegde Protocol. […] Hungary does not consider itself bound by the Protocol annexed to the Hague Act (1960).
6	De depositaris meldde op 20-12-1990 het volgende: Op 03-10-1990 heeft de Duitse Democratische Republiek opgehouden Overeenkomstsluitende Partij bij de onderhavige Overeenkomst te zijn door de toetreding van deze Staat tot de Bondsrepubliek Duitsland. Wat de gelding betreft van de Overeenkomst op het grondgebied van de voormalige Duitse Democratische Republiek zal de depositaris een notificatie opstellen zodra de benodigde informatie daarover is verkregen van de Regering van de Bondsrepubliek Duitsland. In 1992 heeft de Regering van de Bondsrepubliek Duitsland het volgende medegedeeld: Pursuant to provisions on industrial property rights contained in the Treaty of August 31, 1990, between the Federal Republic of Germany and the German Democratic Republic on the creation of the unity of Germany (Unification Treaty), industrial property rights arising from applications or registrations pending or in force on October 2, 1990, in the Federal Republic of Germany or in the German Democratic Republic continued to have effect, as of October 3, 1990, on either the territory of the Federal Republic of Germany as it existed before October 3, 1990, or on the territory of the former German Democratic Republic. Rights originating in the former German Democratic Republic continued to be governed, with a few exceptions relating primarily to procedural provisions, by the respective laws of the former German Democratic Republic. On May 1, 1992, the Law of April 23, 1992, on the extension of industrial property rights entered into force. This Law provides that all industrial property rights which have been maintained for the respective territories of the Federal Republic of Germany as it existed before October 3, 1990, or the former German Democratic Republic are, as of May 1, 1992, automatically extended to the remainder of Germany and will therefore now cover all of Germany. In respect of all those rights the laws of the Federal Republic of Germany apply, with the exception of certain provisions of the former German Democratic Republic on conditions and term of protection. As far as industrial property rights which originated in the Federal Republic of Germany as it existed before October 3, 1990, are concerned, the extension covers the following industrial property rights: — patent rights, including international applications under the Patent Cooperation Treaty which had designated the Federal Republic of Germany and European patents applied for or granted with effect for the Federal Republic of Germany pursuant to the European Patent Convention; — utility model rights, including international applications under the Patent Cooperation Treaty which had designated the Federal Republic of Germany; — rights relating to topographies of integrated circuits; — industrial design rights, including industrial designs deposited with effect for the Federal Republic of Germany under the Hague Agreement concerning the international deposit of industrial designs, and rights concerning typographical type faces; — trademark and service mark rights, including international registrations of marks extended to the Federal Republic of Germany under the Madrid Agreement concerning the international registration of marks. As far as industrial property rights which originated in the former German Democratic Republic are concerned, the extension covers the following industrial property rights: — patent rights, including exclusive patents and economic patents and including patent rights having effect in the German Democratic Republic under the Agreement of December 18, 1976, on the mutual recognition of inventors' certificates and other documents of protection for inventions (Havana Agreement); — industrial design rights, including authors' certificates and patents for industrial designs and including industrial designs deposited with effect for the German Democratic Republic under the Hague Agreement concerning the international deposit of industrial designs; — trademark and service mark rights, including international registrations of marks extended to the German Democratic Republic under the Madrid Agreement concerning the international registration of marks; — registered geographical indications and applications for the registration of geographical indications, which may be converted to collective marks by filing an application within one year after the entry into force of the Law on the extension of industrial property rights; the priority of the registration or application date is preserved. When, as a result of the extension, extended industrial property rights come into conflict, special rules apply. Whereas in the case of conflicting patents, utility models and industrial designs, the respective rights have no effect against each other, in the case of conflicting trademarks and service marks the respective marks may not be used in the territory not covered by them previously if the holder of a mark in that territory objects to such use. These principles are, however, subject to a number of exceptions.
7	De Federale Republiek Joegoslavië wordt door het Koninkrijk der Nederlanden niet erkend. Servië heeft op 09-06-2006 de volgende verklaring afgelegd: Following the declaration of the state independence of Montenegro, and under the Article 60 of the Constitutional Charter of the state union of Serbia and Montenegro, the Republic of Serbia is continuing international personality of the state union of Serbia and Montenegro, which was confirmed also by the National Assembly of the Republic of Serbia at its session held on 5 June 2006.
8	Slovenië heeft n.a.v. de bekrachtiging op 29-12-1993 het volgende aan de depositaris medegedeeld: … The Permanent Mission of the Republic of Slovenia expresses deep discontentment to the Director General of the World Intellectual Property Organization caused by the deposition of its instruments by an internationally unrecognized country such as the Federal Republic of Yugoslavia. … België, Denemarken, Duitsland, Frankrijk, Italië, Oostenrijk, het Koninkrijk der Nederlanden en Spanje hebben aan de depositaris medegedeeld dat zij deze bekrachtiging niet geldig achten.
9	Toetreding door de Duitse Democratische Republiek onder de volgende verklaring: Regarding the provisions of Article 27 of the Hague Agreement concerning the international deposit of industrial designs of November 6, 1925, as revised at The Hague on November 28, 1960, and supplemented at Stockholm on July 14, 1967, as far as the application of the Agreement to colonial regions and other dependent territories is concerned, the German Democratic Republic is guided by the provisions of the United Nations Declaration on the granting of independence to colonial countries and peoples (Resolution No. 1514 (XV) of December 14, 1960) proclaiming the necessity of bringing to a speedy and unconditional end colonialism in all its forms and manifestations. (vertaling)
10	De datum van de nederlegging van de akte van bekrachtiging door Monaco is niet 13-10-1983 maar 13-10-1981.
11	Bekrachtiging door Italië onder vermelding dat de akte van bekrachtiging mede van toepassing is op het Protocol.
12	Opzegging door Hongarije op 01-02-2004 van de herziening Londen 1934 (‘London Act’) (buitenwerkingtreding: 01-02-2005).
13	Verklaring van voortgezette gebondenheid van Montenegro op 04-12-2006.
14	Verklaring van voortgezette gebondenheid van Montenegro op 04-12-2006.
15	Marokko heeft op 14-06-2018 de volgende verklaring afgelegd: Declaration as required under Rule 36(2) of the Common Regulations Under the 1999 Act and the 1960 Act of the Hague Agreement, specifying that the maximum duration of protection provided for by the legislation of Morocco in respect of industrial designs is 25 years.
16	Oekraïne heeft op 30-05-2020 de volgende verklaring afgelegd: […] the declarations as required under Article 17(3)(c) of the Geneva Act (1999) of the Hague Agreement Concerning the International Registration of Industrial Designs, and Rule 36(2) of the Common Regulations Under the 1999 Act and the 1960 Act of the Hague Agreement, specifying that the maximum duration of protection provided for by the legislation of Ukraine in respect of industrial designs is 25 years.