Einde inhoudsopgave
European Convention on the international validity of criminal judgments
Article 26
Geldend
Geldend vanaf 26-07-1974
- Bronpublicatie:
28-05-1970, Trb. 1971, 137 (uitgifte: 11-08-1971, kamerstukken/regelingnummer: -)
- Inwerkingtreding
26-07-1974
- Bronpublicatie inwerkingtreding:
28-10-1987, Trb. 1987, 162 (uitgifte: 01-01-1987, kamerstukken/regelingnummer: -)
- Vakgebied(en)
Internationaal strafrecht / Overdracht en overname strafvervolging
Internationaal publiekrecht / Verdragenrecht
Strafprocesrecht / Algemeen
1.
If the opposition is examined in the requested State the person sentenced shall be summoned to appear in that State at the new hearing of the case. Notice to appear shall be personally served not less than 21 days before the new hearing. This period may be reduced with the consent of the person sentenced. The new hearing shall be held before the court which is competent in the requested State and in accordance with the procedure of that State.
2.
If the person sentenced fails to appear personally or is not represented in accordance with the law of the requested State, the court shall declare the opposition null and void. In that event, and if the court declares the opposition inadmissible, the judgment rendered in absentia or the ‘ordonnance pénale’ shall, for the entire purposes of this Convention, be considered as having been rendered after a hearing of the accused.
3.
If the person sentenced appears personally or is represented in accordance with the law of the requested State, and if the opposition is admissible, the act shall be tried as if it had been committed in that State. Preclusion of proceedings by reason of lapse of time shall, however, in no circumstances be examined. The judgment rendered in the requesting State shall be considered null and void.
4.
Any step with a view to proceedings or a preliminary enquiry, taken in the sentencing State in accordance with its law and regulations, shall have the same validity in the requested State as if it had been taken by the authorities of that State, provided that assimilation does not give such steps a greater evidential weight than they have in the requesting State.