Convention on Jurisdiction, Applicable Law, Recognition, Enforcement and Co-operation in respect of Parental Responsibility and Measures for the Protection of Children:Article 7

Convention on Jurisdiction, Applicable Law, Recognition, Enforcement and Co-operation in respect of Parental Responsibility and Measures for the Protection of Children

Article 7

Geldend

Documentgegevens:

Geldend vanaf 01-01-2002

Bronpublicatie:: 19-10-1996, Trb. 1997, 299 (uitgifte: 01-12-1997, kamerstukken/regelingnummer: -)
Inwerkingtreding: 01-01-2002
Bronpublicatie inwerkingtreding:: 03-03-2003, Trb. 2003, 35 (uitgifte: 01-01-2003, kamerstukken/regelingnummer: -)
Vakgebied(en): Internationaal privaatrecht / Internationaal bevoegdheidsrecht
Personen- en familierecht / Kinderbescherming

1.

In case of wrongful removal or retention of the child, the authorities of the Contracting State in which the child was habitually resident immediately before the removal or retention keep their jurisdiction until the child has acquired a habitual residence in another State, and

a): each person, institution or other body having rights of custody has acquiesced in the removal or retention; or
b): the child has resided in that other State for a period of at least one year after the person, institution or other body having rights of custody has or should have had knowledge of the whereabouts of the child, no request for return lodged within that period is still pending, and the child is settled in his or her new environment.

2.

The removal or the retention of a child is to be considered wrongful where —

a): it is in breach of rights of custody attributed to a person, an institution or any other body, either jointly or alone, under the law of the State in which the child was habitually resident immediately before the removal or retention; and
b): at the time of removal or retention those rights were actually exercised, either jointly or alone, or would have been so exercised but for the removal or retention.

The rights of custody mentioned in sub-paragraph a above, may arise in particular by operation of law or by reason of a judicial or administrative decision, or by reason of an agreement having legal effect under the law of that State.

3.

So long as the authorities first mentioned in paragraph 1 keep their jurisdiction, the authorities of the Contracting State to which the child has been removed or in which he or she has been retained can take only such urgent measures under Article 11 as are necessary for the protection of the person or property of the child.