Einde inhoudsopgave
Draft Common Frame of Reference
28 Maintaining the contractual relationship
Geldend
Geldend vanaf 01-01-2009
- Redactionele toelichting
De dag van de datum van afkondiging is gezet op 01. De datum van inwerkingtreding is de datum van afkondiging.
- Bronpublicatie:
01-01-2009, Internet 2009, ec.europa.eu (uitgifte: 01-01-2009, kamerstukken/regelingnummer: -)
- Inwerkingtreding
01-01-2009
- Bronpublicatie inwerkingtreding:
01-01-2009, Internet 2009, ec.europa.eu (uitgifte: 01-01-2009, kamerstukken/regelingnummer: -)
- Vakgebied(en)
Civiel recht algemeen (V)
EU-recht / Bijzondere onderwerpen
Internationaal privaatrecht / Algemeen
This aim, recognised in the Principes directeurs under the heading of faveur pour le contrat,1. is also recognised in various provisions in the DCFR — for example those on interpretation,2. and on the power of the court to adapt a contract which is affected by invalidity.3. Also, the debtor's right to cure a non-conforming performance4. can be seen as being aimed at the preservation of the contractual relationship, as this right may avoid the execution of remedies, including termination. The same aim underlies the provisions which supplement the parties' agreement when there are points which the parties appear to have overlooked. In a sense, many rules of contract law — for example, the remedies available for non-performance — are ‘default rules’ that fill gaps in what the parties had agreed, thus helping to maintain an effective working relationship. But there are a number of rules dealing specifically with points which in some systems of law have led the courts to hold that there can be no obligation, even though it seems clear that the parties, despite the incompleteness of their agreement, wished to be bound. These include provisions on determination of the price and other terms.5. Further, the DCFR provides a more general mechanism to supplement the agreement in order to make it workable when it is necessary to provide for a matter which the parties have not foreseen or provided for, thus ‘favouring the contract’ and increasing contractual security.6.
Voetnoten
Art. 0:204. ‘When the contract is subject to interpretation, or when its validity or performance is threatened, the effectiveness of the contract should be preferred if its destruction would harm the legitimate interests of one of the parties.’
See II. — 8:106. ‘An interpretation which renders the terms of the contract lawful, or effective, is to be preferred to one which would not.’
See II. — 7:203.
See II. — 9:104 ff.
II. — 9:101. The relevant provisions of PECL were slightly less restrictive. They were changed in the light of representations by stakeholders.